Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="moneycostingmemoney, post: 2727330, member: 86367"]...pretty much...nothing. The fact that I found 3 of them was the statement and the first time I had mentioned it so that makes sense. Are you asking why mention it at all? It's a very non-Paris Hilton explanation, barely worth mentioning, but if that's what you're asking bare with a collectors stance for a minute. In the clad era of the Roosevelt Dime it was the lowest minted (145,790,000) next to the 09 P (96,500,000) and 09 D (49,500,000), and after it would come the 71 (162,690,000). The rest are roughly 350mil to well above 1bil. That said, I just chuck them in a big jar, along with the other dates mentioned, because, historically, lower mintages have a way of being worth more than face value many, many years down the road. If nothing else I'll have a BIG jar of dimes I can bring to a bank and have them give me that eras equivalent which, by that time, MAY buy me a pack of gum. HH![/QUOTE]