Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 1329901, member: 27832&quot;]Now you&#039;re starting to scare me.</p><p><br /></p><p>If an article like <a href="http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&amp;ArticleId=10023" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&amp;ArticleId=10023" rel="nofollow">this one</a> doesn&#039;t mention 1955 dimes being NIFC, where are you seeing information indicating that they were?</p><p><br /></p><p>For that matter, <a href="http://rooseveltdimes.net/roosevelt-dime-mintage/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://rooseveltdimes.net/roosevelt-dime-mintage/" rel="nofollow">this page</a> explicitly states that &quot;The lowest mintage coin issued for circulation was the 1955 Roosevelt Dime&quot;. Since I don&#039;t know where <i>they </i>got<i> their</i> information, I don&#039;t necessarily take their word over yours, of course. But if the 1955 dimes really were NIFC, there ought to be sources <i>somewhere</i> that say so. I can&#039;t find any. I certainly don&#039;t remember seeing any note to that effect in the Red Book or other sources, although I don&#039;t have them handy at the moment...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in