Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CAM2, post: 2497545, member: 80799&quot;]<b>Products include last issues in 10-year Presidential dollar series</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now things are starting to make sense to me and with an article I ran across that clearly answers the question I had many times about how and why the US Mint can uncaringly give out low quality coins in their 2016 proofsets and make such stupid mistakes concerning the 2016 proofsets because my 2015 Proofsets were practically pristine... </p><p><br /></p><p>Im very surprised the link wasnt posted in my other posts concerning questions about the quality of the coins in my 2016 silver and regular proofset and how a human putting these things together could just put coins that look coffee stained also damaged and crooked into the sets and not have a conscience about it......</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a proofset with misplaced quarters,,a proofset where Gerald Ford has a shiner under his eye...</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a proofset where the quarter has a diechip pressed into the obverse rimedge and damaged reeding on the coins edging...</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a set where one of the presidential coins shows traits of being struck with an overpolished die aswell as one struck by an abraded die too...A couple have really sketchy lettering with diechips under the manganese brass then struck over by the 3 collar edge printer</p><p><br /></p><p>Now I know its Robots and not humans putting together these ridiculous proofsets....Robots cant tell the difference in coin quality or really care how they place the coins into their holders.....Most likely they just identify the coin according to weight and a CCTV camera......As you can see two out of 5 quarters werent set like the other 3....LOL</p><p><br /></p><p>So now I have a couple questions....If the mints robot damages a proofset coin does it count as a PMD and how much significant value would the proofset lose due to these damages?</p><p><br /></p><p>Now the US Mint at San Francisco needs to ramp up their end result in operations with a quality control line to ensure the robots are doing their job to the Mints best interests because with quality like I described the proofsets others buy will be sent back and the mint will have to replace the unhappy customers merchandise return with something else from stock and thats not very cost effective IMO...Catching the coin before it hits the sets and the streets into customers hands is....</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]529482[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in