Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Rising values of counterstamped coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="ExoMan, post: 3078163, member: 72588"]I was just in the process of doing a search for some counterstamp info and stumbled upon this old thread. Upon reading it through, I thought I'd offer my "penny's worth" on the <b>I</b>/<b>J</b> discussion. It's long been my understanding that the early use of the "I" initial was specifically used by men named John. John translates to Ian; the names being synonymous. </p><p><br /></p><p>Here's an example from my collection. Beldon, author of a book on silversmiths, attributes the below <b>I-B</b> hallmark (with a dot or bullet between the letters) to John Burger. He does not mention the heart "touchmarks." Beldon dated it to 1805-07. Burger was listed as a silversmith in an 1808 directory, doing business at 62 James Street in NY City. Note that the below host coin is dated 1801, being consistent with the era that Belden ascribed to this mark.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]774615[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]774616[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Here's hoping that this interesting counterstamp thread continues to evolve ....[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="ExoMan, post: 3078163, member: 72588"]I was just in the process of doing a search for some counterstamp info and stumbled upon this old thread. Upon reading it through, I thought I'd offer my "penny's worth" on the [B]I[/B]/[B]J[/B] discussion. It's long been my understanding that the early use of the "I" initial was specifically used by men named John. John translates to Ian; the names being synonymous. Here's an example from my collection. Beldon, author of a book on silversmiths, attributes the below [B]I-B[/B] hallmark (with a dot or bullet between the letters) to John Burger. He does not mention the heart "touchmarks." Beldon dated it to 1805-07. Burger was listed as a silversmith in an 1808 directory, doing business at 62 James Street in NY City. Note that the below host coin is dated 1801, being consistent with the era that Belden ascribed to this mark. [ATTACH=full]774615[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]774616[/ATTACH] Here's hoping that this interesting counterstamp thread continues to evolve ....[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Rising values of counterstamped coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...