Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2934360, member: 36230&quot;]Which would require some sort of interaction, wouldn&#039;t it? Catching on to the obvious yet, Mike?</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, can you not keep your position straight? First it&#039;s simply about &quot;<i>referring to someone as they would like you to</i>&quot; but oh so quickly changes to what someone &quot;<i>clearly</i>&quot; is or is not. See the problem when one refuses to apply logic to purely emotional positions? Of course, why would one bother when absolute capitulation is the only acceptable option lest one be labeled an &quot;idiot&quot; or one of the ever-fine &quot;ist&quot; terms those like you so love to dole out.</p><p><br /></p><p>The most simple and obvious point behind this was that no one can automatically know what another prefers, yet even this seems to escape you. Funny how not referring to someone as they prefer is unforgivable, yet referring to those who disagree in whatever often vile way they surely don&#039;t prefer is perfectly kosher. <i>&quot;Idiot</i>&quot; indeed...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in