Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by iloveallcoins, Dec 8, 2017.
Probable answer: Absolutely nothing.
Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.
No, I mean common courtesy as in referring to someone as they would like you to, not as what fits neatly in a box.
I once had a mentor who advocated that you not treat people as “you” want to be treated as has been taught for decades, but as the people themselves would like to be treated.
That’s the evolution of thought and humankind.
I understand that change isn’t always easy or even welcome, but we progress as a species in spite of this fact.
That is, does the price guide describe the state of the market over the recent past? Or does a price guide dictate that these are the prices you should pay in the near future?
I would argue that they were intended to be descriptive, but we treat them as prescriptive.
No worries yours was the kind of discussion I was trying to stimulate and your input was/is appreciated.
Ikes are next lol.
Grade rarity early coinage is worse off. Coins with rare auction appearances become based off of the sale of 1. If a key date low pop Seated Quarter drops you will see the value drop to just above the sale price, as also happened to me recently. PCGS price guide dropped $5000 based purely off of the sale of a single coin.
In 2015, the PCGS guide for 1963 MS-66 FBL was $25,000: https://www.pcgs.com/pricehistory#/?=86684-66
However, this coin sold in October 2015 for $17,600: https://coins.ha.com/itm/franklin-h...5-3357.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515
THE NGC GUIDE CURRENTLY HAS THIS LISTED AT $37,000!!!!! What a ridiculous load of bollocks. Anyone following the NGC guide is going to be in for a rude awakening.
You'll notice in the PCGS guide linked above, the values started dropping shortly after this sale. There have been no sales on Heritage since. However, the value listed in the PCGS price guide now corresponds to the last recorded Heritage sale..... coincidence?
I chose the 1963 in 66 FBL because it's the one coin I keep track of in the Franklin series. I built an award winning set on the NGC registry, but sold most of it a few years ago. I kept this coin because it is an amazing beauty, and I couldn't part with it. Currently graded NGC 65+* FBL, I'd put it up against any 66FBL you could show me:
One thing about NGC Franklins though is the rarities do tend to sell more then PCGS. I think for a while they used to grade FBL by the upper and lower lines which as PCGS has only ever graded the lower lines (they may still but not likely judging by some I have seen lately lol). Also NGC populations for FBL coins are much lower then PCGS.
I will note though that though all the PCGS guide drops NGC realized prices have remained remarkably stable and PCGS coins are dropping to realized prices more consistent with their NGC counterparts. Perhaps the market is shifting?
PCGS is ONLY king because of registry set collecting. Their standards are no better or worse then other graders though many rookie collectors that have read an online blog would probably disagree with me.....but have not been buying enough multi thousand dollar coins to see they all get it both wrong and right.
Then there is the other two:
ICG has gone completely crazy since ebay seller centsless hung up his self slabbed NNC holders and found a way to get ICG to overgrade his junk.
ANACS is very good but their best stuff is picked though and crossed to PCGS. That leaves a lot of the over graded stuff in the market.
By whom? In almost 15 years of talking about this stuff on the Internet I've never once heard an educated opinion (as in, coming from someone who knew what they were talking about) that the PCGS price guide was anything but an exercise in wild optimism on their part.
From the buy-the-coin-not-the-slab dept: I'm a collector and not a dealer or investor. One of the collections I'm building out is a set of Frankie 65-FBLs (except the 53S...not paying that much for a coin). I use the 65 FBL for filtering purposes but in the end, I'm buying the coin. As was mentioned, PCGS is worse than NGC (and ANACS) for FBLs because they only look at lower lines. I eliminate most PCGS 65s for this alone. Even if all of the lines are solid, I might be turned off by ugly toning or some other factor for that particular coin. That being said, I recently paid over PCGS and Numismedia market value for a 52S 64FBL because it was gorgeous and clean even with the noticeable flaw that made it a 64. I personally preferred that coin over many of the 65FBL 52Ss I've seen. In the end, buying Frankies (as a collector) is no different than buying many things...What am I willing to pay for something I want at that moment in time? There is no wrong answer if it makes me happy.
To me, it seems PCGS is correcting their prices down from the highs of a few years ago but I'll defer to you all on that. I'd hate to be the person responsible for assigning one number for so many coins that may have the same technical grade but vary so much aesthetically (eye of the beholder and all) and range in prices.
My point stands. It's never been worth talking about, it still isn't worth talking about, and your belief that it ever was worth talking about is a very minority one.
The PCGS price has never been worth talking about - and still isn't !
Well I did that, and then I read the rest of the thread, and it explained a lot. The main thing being that you are working on a bunch of false assumptions.
First of all, do you know what the PCGS price guide is, what it is based on ? I'm asking because it certainly appears that you do not ! But if you'd just look, PCGS tells you what it is based on. And I quote -
"The prices listed in the PCGS Price Guide are average dealer asking prices for PCGS-graded coins. The prices are compiled from various sources including dealer ads in trade papers, dealer fixed price lists and website offerings, significant auctions, and activity at major coin shows."
Now the underling and bold text is me, but that is a direct quote taken right from the PCGS web site as you can see -
What I am trying to point out to you is that PCGS doesn't just pick prices out of the air, they use prices that are given to them by dealers - it the dealers who are setting the prices, not PCGS. So that's one bad assumption you are using to base your theory on.
But if you did a bit more exploring on the PCGS web site you could see other things as well. For example, there's this - https://www.pcgs.com/prices/pricechanges.aspx - you may be aware of it already, and since so many Frankies are listed there I'm kind of assuming that you are since Frankies are what you're talking about. And yes, those changes listed match the Price Guide prices - https://www.pcgs.com/prices/priceguidedetail.aspx?ms=4&pr=1&sp=1&c=734&title=franklin+half+dollar
But are you also aware of this ? - https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/
If you look at that, for Frankies, you'll see this -
They are all there, actual realized auction prices as reported by PCGS. But if you look at them those realized prices are a lot lower than the prices listed in the PCGS price guide. And there's a reason for that, it's because the price guide prices, (the dealer asking prices), are too dang high. The coin market has been dropping steadily for almost 10 years and people, buyers, know that. And that is why they are not paying dealer asking prices.
So you can get ready for it now or you can wait until it comes, but the prices in the PCGS price guide will continue to fall. And not because PCGS says so, but because the dealers will continue to drop their prices in an effort to get people to buy from them.
Bottom line, your whole theory doesn't hold water. And that's what people have been trying to tell you this entire thread.
I’ve stayed on the outside of this thread cause I dislike these ugly coins, so plain, so vanilla, but did find one nugget that I found entertaining. That’s @baseball21 has a new nickname: FANBOY. Lol. Can I be your side kick I’ll be Butt Toot. The famous Fan Boy and his side kick Butt Toot. I’m drawing up a graphic novel right now. Headlines will read: “ The evil coin foes of the world beware the coin Hero’s are afoot”
As long as my name goes first on the cover
It is a tool of speculators and con-men, in my estimation.
Separate names with a comma.