Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Riding the Crest
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TIF, post: 4756745, member: 56859"]This.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This too <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>While I wouldn't say no to a full crest example as long as it also had a very well-centered reverse, with the full square described, I don't feel inclined to pay the steep premium for a full crest... especially not one deemed so by a label within the plastic box <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. <font size="3">(because it will drive the price very high from the registry-minded crowd!)</font></p><p><br /></p><p>For years I refrained from getting an owl tet because the prices were so annoyingly high. It's such a common coin! Why the high price tag?! There's no denying its importance in history though and I finally caved last year. I still didn't want to spend a lot though so I picked my faults carefully. As pprp said, there were only a few designs/dies in which Athena's head was small enough to leave room for a full crest on these compact flans, so a full crest was out. Other than ensuring the obverse was centered well enough for her nose to be off flan or touching the edge, my primary goal was to have a reverse with a full square or nearly full square. I didn't feel compelled to buy a superduper high grade example and here's what I ended up buying:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/owltet-rt-jpg.939733/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><b>ATTICA, Athens</b></p><p>c. 454-404 BCE</p><p>AR tetradrachm; 17.21 gm, ~25 mm</p><p>Obv: head of Athena right, with frontal eye</p><p>Rev: owl standing right, head facing, closed tail feathers; olive sprig and crescent to left; AΘE downward in right field; all within incuse square</p><p>Removed from an NGC slab; AU 5/5 strike, 3/5 surfaces, "Parliament Collection"</p><p><br /></p><p>At some point I would like a couple of earlier examples-- and archaic and a transitional. Maybe some time in the much farther future I'll pick up a later example with profile eye and even an imitative.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TIF, post: 4756745, member: 56859"]This. This too :D. While I wouldn't say no to a full crest example as long as it also had a very well-centered reverse, with the full square described, I don't feel inclined to pay the steep premium for a full crest... especially not one deemed so by a label within the plastic box ;) :D. [SIZE=3](because it will drive the price very high from the registry-minded crowd!)[/SIZE] For years I refrained from getting an owl tet because the prices were so annoyingly high. It's such a common coin! Why the high price tag?! There's no denying its importance in history though and I finally caved last year. I still didn't want to spend a lot though so I picked my faults carefully. As pprp said, there were only a few designs/dies in which Athena's head was small enough to leave room for a full crest on these compact flans, so a full crest was out. Other than ensuring the obverse was centered well enough for her nose to be off flan or touching the edge, my primary goal was to have a reverse with a full square or nearly full square. I didn't feel compelled to buy a superduper high grade example and here's what I ended up buying: [IMG]https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/owltet-rt-jpg.939733/[/IMG] [B]ATTICA, Athens[/B] c. 454-404 BCE AR tetradrachm; 17.21 gm, ~25 mm Obv: head of Athena right, with frontal eye Rev: owl standing right, head facing, closed tail feathers; olive sprig and crescent to left; AΘE downward in right field; all within incuse square Removed from an NGC slab; AU 5/5 strike, 3/5 surfaces, "Parliament Collection" At some point I would like a couple of earlier examples-- and archaic and a transitional. Maybe some time in the much farther future I'll pick up a later example with profile eye and even an imitative.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Riding the Crest
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...