Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DieVarietyNews, post: 1004936, member: 27410&quot;]Below is an example that I came across.&nbsp; Granted, it&#039;s not the same date but the exact same phenomenon is happening on this 1963 Lincoln cent that happened on Jody&#039;s 1964 Lincoln cent.</p><p><br /></p><p>We can see the heavy die polishing the Mint press operator applied to the obverse working die so as to hide the die clash remnants affecting that particular area.&nbsp; Already the extreme polishing has seriously diminished the lower detail of the digit &quot;1&quot; of the date as well as also affecting some of the other date digits.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the reverse we can just barely see the remaining remnants of the die clash in bays #3 and #8.</p><p><br /></p><p>The same phenomenon on this 1963 is also what happened on the 1964 cent.&nbsp; However, the only difference is that Jody&#039;s coin is more at the end of a full production run and the metal flow lines have also compounded to the eroding away of the lower section of the digit &quot;1&quot; even more so and has wash-out the die polishing.</p><p><br /></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Billy</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]97238.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]97239.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in