Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Richmond show part 3 - the also rans
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2007861, member: 19463"]Completing my pickups from the Richmond show are three lesser coins. Oldest is a 138 BC Republican with Roma and the common reverse of the Dioscuri. What attracted me to the coin was the old letter form of P open at the bottom so it is really half way between the Greek pi and the Latin P. The coin was issued by Publius Aelius Paetus so we get two good P examples. The coin was made cheaper by the retained encrustations on both sides which show worse in my photo than in hand.[ATTACH=full]361132[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The other two are medieval deniers of the Crusaders. Common and popular is Bohemund III of Antioch 1163-1201 AD famous for the absolute worst portrait style of a knight in helmet facing left. The legends are readable (BOAMVNDVS/ANTIO CIVITA) if you know what they are to start with but not so much otherwise. This coin shows a knight in shining armor but I assume he had his visor down since it is really hard to find anything you might call a face. There are some better and some worse.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]361133[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Finally is a denier of Duke Guy II of Athens 1294-1308 AD. In this case I'm calling the cross side the obverse since that side has the royal name (GVI DVX ATENOS). The reverse has the mint of Thebes (ThEBAN CIVES) around a castle tournois which is seriously compromised by the thin flan having given all its metal to the cross so you can see a negative image of the cross x-ing out the castle. On the other side, between the arms of the cross you see elements of the castle. Both of these coins were thin and, interestingly to me, both weight exactly 0.76g. Guy's coin really suffered from the ghosting making it a fine example of not so fine work. The coin is a thousand years after what we call late Romans and almost two thousand years after the start of coinage in Athens. Progress?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]361134[/ATTACH] </p><p>As medievals go, these are pretty easy to read. That may be why I have so few European medieval coins. Both are common coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>Before I went to the show, I had ordered by mail a coin I liked better than these but the post office is not as good for instant gratification as shows so I'm hoping it will arrive tomorrow (or at least I'm hoping it will arrive someday). That is another thing I like about shows.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2007861, member: 19463"]Completing my pickups from the Richmond show are three lesser coins. Oldest is a 138 BC Republican with Roma and the common reverse of the Dioscuri. What attracted me to the coin was the old letter form of P open at the bottom so it is really half way between the Greek pi and the Latin P. The coin was issued by Publius Aelius Paetus so we get two good P examples. The coin was made cheaper by the retained encrustations on both sides which show worse in my photo than in hand.[ATTACH=full]361132[/ATTACH] The other two are medieval deniers of the Crusaders. Common and popular is Bohemund III of Antioch 1163-1201 AD famous for the absolute worst portrait style of a knight in helmet facing left. The legends are readable (BOAMVNDVS/ANTIO CIVITA) if you know what they are to start with but not so much otherwise. This coin shows a knight in shining armor but I assume he had his visor down since it is really hard to find anything you might call a face. There are some better and some worse. [ATTACH=full]361133[/ATTACH] Finally is a denier of Duke Guy II of Athens 1294-1308 AD. In this case I'm calling the cross side the obverse since that side has the royal name (GVI DVX ATENOS). The reverse has the mint of Thebes (ThEBAN CIVES) around a castle tournois which is seriously compromised by the thin flan having given all its metal to the cross so you can see a negative image of the cross x-ing out the castle. On the other side, between the arms of the cross you see elements of the castle. Both of these coins were thin and, interestingly to me, both weight exactly 0.76g. Guy's coin really suffered from the ghosting making it a fine example of not so fine work. The coin is a thousand years after what we call late Romans and almost two thousand years after the start of coinage in Athens. Progress? [ATTACH=full]361134[/ATTACH] As medievals go, these are pretty easy to read. That may be why I have so few European medieval coins. Both are common coins. Before I went to the show, I had ordered by mail a coin I liked better than these but the post office is not as good for instant gratification as shows so I'm hoping it will arrive tomorrow (or at least I'm hoping it will arrive someday). That is another thing I like about shows.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Richmond show part 3 - the also rans
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...