Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Richard Schaefer's Roman Republican Die Project - Now Online!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4652438, member: 110350"]Professor Yarrow has been working on my list of 10 Crawford numbers that I discovered are missing from the index, and has a new blog post up addressing 4 of them so far (plus the 11th Crawford number that I already found in the binders even though it's missing from the index). She has informed me that there's more to come. Here's her post, with my own comments/notes in brackets:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/" rel="nofollow">https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/</a></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="6"><b>What types are not (yet) online for RRDP?!</b></font></p><p><font size="6"><br /></font></p><p>Posted on <a href="https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/" rel="nofollow">July 21, 2020</a> by <a href="https://livyarrow.org/author/achilleamillefolia/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://livyarrow.org/author/achilleamillefolia/" rel="nofollow">Liv Yarrow</a></p><p><br /></p><p><i>This is another working post attempting to respond to user queries and keep a record for myself that can eventually be integrated into an official finding aid on the ANS RRDP website. <a href="http://numismatics.org/pocketchange/schaefer/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/pocketchange/schaefer/" rel="nofollow">Want to know more about RRDP? Go to our most recent blog post!</a></i></p><p><br /></p><p><i>(I thank DonnaML for first raising these questions. PLEASE email me at yarrow [at] brooklyn [dot] cuny [dot] edu if you cannot find an issue in Schaefer’s binders or the index and I will update this post.)</i></p><p><br /></p><p>ODEC = One Die for Each Control-Mark</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4"><b>Status of release for issues not (yet) linked to CRRO</b></font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><a href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=316" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=316" rel="nofollow">316</a>– [<i>Thorius Balbus, Juno Sospita/Bull charging</i>] not indexing correctly, must troubleshoot and update data; for now this this issue can be found in <a href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b02" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b02" rel="nofollow">Binder 2</a>, on pages 50, 51, 54, 55, 58, 59, 64, 65, 68, 70, 71, 74, 76, 77, 80, 81, 84, 85, 88, 89, 92, 93, 96, 97 100, 101, 104, 105, 112, 113, 115; there are also seventeen (!) clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies. [<i>I provided this list of page numbers, so any errors are my responsibility alone, not Prof. Yarrow's.</i>]</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=378" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=378" rel="nofollow">378</a> [<i>C. Marius c.f. Capito, Ceres/Ploughman with oxen</i>] – part of ODEC, likely to be released by September 2020</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=394" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=394" rel="nofollow">394</a> [<i>Postumius, Diana/Hound</i>] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in <a href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" rel="nofollow">Binder 6</a>, on pages 104, 106, 107, 112, 113; there is also one clippings image that has not yet been released, but that will contain no new dies.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=442" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=442" rel="nofollow">442</a> [<i>M. Acilius Glabrio, Salus/Valetudo with snake</i>] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in <a href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" rel="nofollow">Binder 9</a>, on pages 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 20; there are also four clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=453" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=453" rel="nofollow">453</a> [<i>Plautius Plancus, Medusa/Victory with 4 horses</i>] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in <a href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06" rel="nofollow">Binder 9</a>, on pages 178, 179, 182, 184, 185, 190, 191; there are also three clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies.</p><p><br /></p><p>[<i>End of blog post</i>]</p><p><br /></p><p>[<i>Coincidentally or otherwise, Crawford Nos. 394, 442, and 453 are the only three types, out of the 10 missing types I found, that do <u>not</u> have control numbers or other symbols on the coins. So perhaps it's not surprising that it turns out that they're in the binders after all, despite their absence from the index. I'll be curious to learn whether any of the missing types that <u>do</u> have control numbers or other symbols on them can be found in the binders despite being missing from the index, in addition to No. 316, which I already found</i>.][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4652438, member: 110350"]Professor Yarrow has been working on my list of 10 Crawford numbers that I discovered are missing from the index, and has a new blog post up addressing 4 of them so far (plus the 11th Crawford number that I already found in the binders even though it's missing from the index). She has informed me that there's more to come. Here's her post, with my own comments/notes in brackets: [URL]https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/[/URL] [SIZE=6][B]What types are not (yet) online for RRDP?![/B] [/SIZE] Posted on [URL='https://livyarrow.org/2020/07/21/what-types-are-not-yet-online-for-rrdp/']July 21, 2020[/URL] by [URL='https://livyarrow.org/author/achilleamillefolia/']Liv Yarrow[/URL] [I]This is another working post attempting to respond to user queries and keep a record for myself that can eventually be integrated into an official finding aid on the ANS RRDP website. [URL='http://numismatics.org/pocketchange/schaefer/']Want to know more about RRDP? Go to our most recent blog post![/URL][/I] [I](I thank DonnaML for first raising these questions. PLEASE email me at yarrow [at] brooklyn [dot] cuny [dot] edu if you cannot find an issue in Schaefer’s binders or the index and I will update this post.)[/I] ODEC = One Die for Each Control-Mark [SIZE=4][B]Status of release for issues not (yet) linked to CRRO[/B] [/SIZE] [URL='http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=316']316[/URL]– [[I]Thorius Balbus, Juno Sospita/Bull charging[/I]] not indexing correctly, must troubleshoot and update data; for now this this issue can be found in [URL='http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b02']Binder 2[/URL], on pages 50, 51, 54, 55, 58, 59, 64, 65, 68, 70, 71, 74, 76, 77, 80, 81, 84, 85, 88, 89, 92, 93, 96, 97 100, 101, 104, 105, 112, 113, 115; there are also seventeen (!) clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies. [[I]I provided this list of page numbers, so any errors are my responsibility alone, not Prof. Yarrow's.[/I]] [URL='http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=378']378[/URL] [[I]C. Marius c.f. Capito, Ceres/Ploughman with oxen[/I]] – part of ODEC, likely to be released by September 2020 [URL='http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=394']394[/URL] [[I]Postumius, Diana/Hound[/I]] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in [URL='http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06']Binder 6[/URL], on pages 104, 106, 107, 112, 113; there is also one clippings image that has not yet been released, but that will contain no new dies. [URL='http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=442']442[/URL] [[I]M. Acilius Glabrio, Salus/Valetudo with snake[/I]] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in [URL='http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06']Binder 9[/URL], on pages 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 20; there are also four clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies. [URL='http://numismatics.org/crro/results?q=453']453[/URL] [[I]Plautius Plancus, Medusa/Victory with 4 horses[/I]] – disambiguation of sub-types in underlying data is required before the online indexing will reflect location, for now this this issue can be found in [URL='http://numismatics.org/archives/ark:/53695/schaefer.rrdp.b06']Binder 9[/URL], on pages 178, 179, 182, 184, 185, 190, 191; there are also three clippings images that have not yet been released, but those will contain no new dies. [[I]End of blog post[/I]] [[I]Coincidentally or otherwise, Crawford Nos. 394, 442, and 453 are the only three types, out of the 10 missing types I found, that do [U]not[/U] have control numbers or other symbols on the coins. So perhaps it's not surprising that it turns out that they're in the binders after all, despite their absence from the index. I'll be curious to learn whether any of the missing types that [U]do[/U] have control numbers or other symbols on them can be found in the binders despite being missing from the index, in addition to No. 316, which I already found[/I].][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Richard Schaefer's Roman Republican Die Project - Now Online!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...
