Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="zumbly, post: 2475491, member: 57495"]It's probably just an error in RIC.  The new RIC online website here notes that it is a mistake and shows 19 examples for "<a href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/search/advanced?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Claudius+II&asmSelect1=&Person=Claudius+II&asmSelect2=&Mint=Siscia&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&Legend=RESTITVTOR+ORBIS&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/search/advanced?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Claudius+II&asmSelect1=&Person=Claudius+II&asmSelect2=&Mint=Siscia&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&Legend=RESTITVTOR+ORBIS&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result" rel="nofollow">RIC1st 189 corr.</a>".  They have two temp numbers for the issue, the distinction being the bust type.[/QUOTE]