Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Carausius, post: 2977907, member: 76440"]RIC vol 3 uses CC for very common, C for common, S is scarce, R rare, etc. Thus [USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] coin is not very common, though also not rare, according to RIC. This seems consistent with Sear's relative valuation for the type.</p><p><br /></p><p>EDIT: See above. If Sear based his valuation on RIC's rarity estimate, this too could be an error, or indicative of pre-internet sources for the type.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Carausius, post: 2977907, member: 76440"]RIC vol 3 uses CC for very common, C for common, S is scarce, R rare, etc. Thus [USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] coin is not very common, though also not rare, according to RIC. This seems consistent with Sear's relative valuation for the type. EDIT: See above. If Sear based his valuation on RIC's rarity estimate, this too could be an error, or indicative of pre-internet sources for the type.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...