Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Carausius, post: 2977903, member: 76440"][USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] , in your excerpt, RIC 1650 is an AE As, but you describe your coin as an Oricalchum Dupondius. I find no Dupondii listed for Faustina Jr. in RIC, though brass dupondius/copper as is listed interchangeably in Sear's RCV II. Sear gives your type a slightly higher value than other types, though not high enough to suggest tremendous rarity. This begs two questions:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Are you certain you've got a Dupondius? It might just be a heavy As. Color is generally a good guide.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. At you looking for the right denomination(s) in your search? The As may be common and the Dupondius quite rare, or perhaps Dupondii are being misattributed as Asses (since RIC doesn't list Dupondii). Perhaps expand your search to include Asses, which might pick-up misattributed Dupondii.</p><p><br /></p><p>EDIT: I just ran a few searches myself and also find only Sestertii. This could be a case of over-population of a rare type in museum collections (not the first time RIC miscalculated based on museum collections' penchant for rare, attractive types) or just a plain error. Another possibility is that the type appeared in several pre-internet sales, and have not been recently resold.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Carausius, post: 2977903, member: 76440"][USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] , in your excerpt, RIC 1650 is an AE As, but you describe your coin as an Oricalchum Dupondius. I find no Dupondii listed for Faustina Jr. in RIC, though brass dupondius/copper as is listed interchangeably in Sear's RCV II. Sear gives your type a slightly higher value than other types, though not high enough to suggest tremendous rarity. This begs two questions: 1. Are you certain you've got a Dupondius? It might just be a heavy As. Color is generally a good guide. 2. At you looking for the right denomination(s) in your search? The As may be common and the Dupondius quite rare, or perhaps Dupondii are being misattributed as Asses (since RIC doesn't list Dupondii). Perhaps expand your search to include Asses, which might pick-up misattributed Dupondii. EDIT: I just ran a few searches myself and also find only Sestertii. This could be a case of over-population of a rare type in museum collections (not the first time RIC miscalculated based on museum collections' penchant for rare, attractive types) or just a plain error. Another possibility is that the type appeared in several pre-internet sales, and have not been recently resold.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...