Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2977856, member: 75937"]I've been researching this recent acquisition:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]732068[/ATTACH] </p><p><font size="3">Faustina Jr, under Marcus Aurelius, AD 161-175 </font></p><p><font size="3">Roman orichalcum dupondius; 13.23 g, 25.1 mm, 6 h </font></p><p><font size="3">Rome, AD 161-175 </font></p><p><font size="3">Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right </font></p><p><font size="3">Rev: IVNONI LVCINAE, Juno standing left between two children, holding a third child on left arm </font></p><p><font size="3">Refs: RIC 1650; BMCRE p. 541, *; Cohen 137; RCV 5298; MIR 18.</font></p><p><br /></p><p>It appears to be much scarcer than RIC would imply. RIC says 1650 is "common." </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]732070[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I can find several examples of the corresponding sestertius, RIC 1649, but not a single example of the dupondius is to be found among the 31575 Roman imperial coins at <a href="http://www.coinproject.com/issuer_middle.php?type=3" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinproject.com/issuer_middle.php?type=3" rel="nofollow">The Coin Project</a>, and none are to be found at <a href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/" rel="nofollow">Coin Archives</a> or <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/" rel="nofollow">acsearchinfo</a>. <a href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coins_sold.aspx" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coins_sold.aspx" rel="nofollow">CNG</a> has never sold one and none are for sale at <a href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/Default.aspx" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">V-Coins</a>. The only example I could find online is this <a href="http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/sear5/s5298.html#RIC_1650" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/sear5/s5298.html#RIC_1650" rel="nofollow">one from the Wildwinds database</a>. It has to be scarce, if not rare. Anyone know of other examples online? </p><p><br /></p><p>Post anything you feel is relevant, of course.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2977856, member: 75937"]I've been researching this recent acquisition: [ATTACH=full]732068[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Faustina Jr, under Marcus Aurelius, AD 161-175 Roman orichalcum dupondius; 13.23 g, 25.1 mm, 6 h Rome, AD 161-175 Obv: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, bare-headed and draped bust, right Rev: IVNONI LVCINAE, Juno standing left between two children, holding a third child on left arm Refs: RIC 1650; BMCRE p. 541, *; Cohen 137; RCV 5298; MIR 18.[/SIZE] It appears to be much scarcer than RIC would imply. RIC says 1650 is "common." [ATTACH=full]732070[/ATTACH] I can find several examples of the corresponding sestertius, RIC 1649, but not a single example of the dupondius is to be found among the 31575 Roman imperial coins at [URL='http://www.coinproject.com/issuer_middle.php?type=3']The Coin Project[/URL], and none are to be found at [URL='https://www.coinarchives.com/a/']Coin Archives[/URL] or [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/']acsearchinfo[/URL]. [URL='https://www.cngcoins.com/Coins_sold.aspx']CNG[/URL] has never sold one and none are for sale at [URL='https://www.vcoins.com/en/Default.aspx']V-Coins[/URL]. The only example I could find online is this [URL='http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/sear5/s5298.html#RIC_1650']one from the Wildwinds database[/URL]. It has to be scarce, if not rare. Anyone know of other examples online? Post anything you feel is relevant, of course.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
RIC claims it's common; it isn't
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...