Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Reviewing Attributions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Orfew, post: 3552348, member: 74968"]I never take the attribution from a website or auction house at face value. I always check the references in my own collection against the source I am researching. I have found many errors that way. I am always checking the references. My collection is up to date regarding RIC, but I still need to add RSC and BMCRE for some coins. I also find it interesting to find which coins are not in certain references. For example I have several coins that are not in BMCRE or RSC or the early RIC. I have a few that only appear in the updated RIC II Part 1 (2007).</p><p><br /></p><p>Another reason I always check the reference is that I have found some great rarities that way. With the coins of Domitian for example, misattributions are very common. The misattribution can result in finding out that a coin thought common is actually quite rare. I have of course found the opposite as well-an auction misattributes a coin as a rare type when in fact it is quite common. I have found that owning the references is a very good investment.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Orfew, post: 3552348, member: 74968"]I never take the attribution from a website or auction house at face value. I always check the references in my own collection against the source I am researching. I have found many errors that way. I am always checking the references. My collection is up to date regarding RIC, but I still need to add RSC and BMCRE for some coins. I also find it interesting to find which coins are not in certain references. For example I have several coins that are not in BMCRE or RSC or the early RIC. I have a few that only appear in the updated RIC II Part 1 (2007). Another reason I always check the reference is that I have found some great rarities that way. With the coins of Domitian for example, misattributions are very common. The misattribution can result in finding out that a coin thought common is actually quite rare. I have of course found the opposite as well-an auction misattributes a coin as a rare type when in fact it is quite common. I have found that owning the references is a very good investment.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Reviewing Attributions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...