Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;IdesOfMarch01, post: 3386570, member: 39084&quot;]Maybe I have a much more restrictive definition of &quot;unique,&quot; but personally I find that about 80% of the coins illustrated in this thread aren&#039;t really what I&#039;d call unique reverses.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are just a few that illustrate my definition of unique:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]899493[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]899495[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]899498[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s an example of one that doesn&#039;t fit my definition of unique:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]899496[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Contrast the two coins immediately above, and ask yourself the following: if I were to glance (less than one second per coin) at these two coins, side-by-side, in a tray at a coin show or in a dealer&#039;s shop, which one would make me think &quot;Wow -- there&#039;s an unusual reverse; I wonder if that&#039;s unique to the emperor?&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe my definition is too restrictive and non-quantifiable for this thread, but that&#039;s where I situate my idea of uniqueness relative to this thread.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in