Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;7Jags, post: 3589856, member: 78719&quot;]It IS NOT A PROOF! Actually, even the proofs are quite scarce. So wrong on both counts. Please try to even find a proof right now on the internet &amp; you will see only one entire set for sale.</p><p>The date and mint mark FM, and type of 1984 are not common at all.</p><p>This is an uncirculated coin however, and NOT proof.</p><p>This is the proof copper-nickel and there is the sterling silver variety also.</p><p><br /></p><p>So the 1984 FM 50c in proof are:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>KM-54&nbsp; Copper Nickel</p><p>KM-54a Sterling Silver</p><p><br /></p><p>NO UNCIRCULATED 1984FM coins are catalogued or are known. The 1983FM coin of the previous year from specimen sets (VERY RARE) is also under the KM-54 type; this by the way is erroneously listed as (M) for matte when in fact it is of the (U) or proof like type.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]959160[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]959161[/ATTACH]</p><p>Not sure where you are getting off being so nasty there &quot;spirityoda&quot;. Please come correct first, your disposition is your own yolk and your nomen rather ironic. I was trying to pick up a point of interest - really that is nastiness not called for. </p><p>Absolutely not to beat my own chest but I have been for many years a contributor to Krause and their late beloved catalog.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in