Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jwitten, post: 3844195, member: 70583&quot;]I had 6 vouchers expiring soon, so sent a few gold in.</p><p><br /></p><p>MS61. Super clean looking for 61, in my opinion</p><p><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/cy/k352ofcyk221.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>AU58. I thought it had a shot at MS, which being a rarer date would have been worth it</p><p><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ds/7wtwt46lmtig.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>AU58. Same story for this one. I like the odd raised bumps on the reverse rim at 10-11:00. Have not seen any others like this.</p><p><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/rx/ketarmtdsda5.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>AU55. Came out of a AU details cleaned NGC holder. I didn&#039;t think she was cleaned. Has a retained cud error on the reverse, but wanted to test the grade before I paid the extra error fees.<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ou/ev02pc3p32am.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>AU55. I loved the color.</p><p><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/ax/s2z1eu1jicqa.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>MS61. I was hoping for prooflike, and still think it is. I figured it would either grade cleaned or PL. Maybe NGC would grade it prooflike?<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/48/lgvs4y32774x.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in