Saw this '09-s in Bower's auction and I I see some VDB left. The V for sure. Whaddya think?http://www.stacksbowers.com/browseauctions/lotdetail.aspx?AuctionID=6101&Lot=20196
I do not understand the term "Residual VDB" since it implies that the V.D.B. "was" there but is now not there. No other evidence on the coin supports such a theory.
I think I know what he is seeing. The attached photos are of a 1909 VBD that I have that has a similar image. The VBD is warn but the image is there from a side view rather than from straight on. a side view.
If you're talking about that little lump at the bottom, I don't think so, although I don't know what made that mark.
Your red line goes right over the top of the V and right through the top of the D and through the middle of where the B should be.
Well, I think you're imagining things. There, someone said it. On a VF30 coin, even on a weak VDB, you're going to see it. "Residual VDB" is a hopeful term as there's either a VDB or there isn't, there are no fragments of VDBs. There's a dot there, and I don't know where that came from.
Then explain the image in this photo. As I said earlier you can see the VBD image from a side angle but not straight on.
Hi all. I'm a recent CT forum reader, and this is my first post, so please excuse any errors. I also have a 1909 (VDB?) exactly like the one shown here. And, like this one, the initials can only be seen from an angle. I assumed the initials were ground off the die so it could still be used after the furor over the initials being there. A few few months ago I sent Q. David an email about this coin, and never received an answer.