Repunched Mintmark?!?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Hunting Rare, Apr 23, 2020.

  1. Hunting Rare

    Hunting Rare Active Member

    Definitely not a nickel guy, or a R.P.M. guy. This 64-Denver Jefferson's M.M. looks super fat in hand, and doesn't really look like your traditional die deterioration doubling or mechanical doubling often seen in this area....R.P.M. or not? Just checkin'...hoping it's a 501 of course, it does have all known die markers!

    S20200423_414.jpg S20200417_011.jpg S20200423_415.jpg S20200422_013.jpg
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    How about a normal picture of the entire Nickel?
    Front and back :watching:

    I'm thinking a worn die issue.
    tmoneyeagles and Hunting Rare like this.
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Looks normal from what I can see.
    Hunting Rare likes this.
  5. desertgem

    desertgem MODERATOR Senior Errer Collecktor Moderator

    Normal for the species.
    Hunting Rare likes this.
  6. Mike185

    Mike185 Well-Known Member

    I think the saturation’s mark may be stumping you...
    Hunting Rare likes this.
  7. Hunting Rare

    Hunting Rare Active Member

    I think you're right on that one...

    So I was going through all my rolls of 1964-Denver Nickels and found this one which I think looks much closer to a R.P.M. Sorry for the pics, having trouble photographing this M.M. with this coin's luster.....

    What do you guys think about this one? R.P.M. or nahhhh?

    S20200507_004.jpg S20200507_006.jpg
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page