Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Republicans doing things
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3074024, member: 19463"]I have often expressed my strong aversion for coin types showing nothing more than someone standing there. I don't care if you are a major god from Olympus, don't just stand there, throw a thunderbolt or carry off a struggling maiden --- do something. My coin show purchases from yesterday included two Roman Republican types showing action heroes. Both were issued by junior, aspiring politicians who wanted you to associate them with a Roman hero who just happened to be their grandfather. At that time it was unacceptable to blow your own horn but pointing out that you were descended from a long line of saviors of the State was perfectly acceptable. </p><p><br /></p><p>The first of M. Servilius requires the viewer to know the details of the battle scene with two warriors fighting with hoses rearing in the background. Grandpa was a war hero. The coin has a dark tone concealing some nicks that would ruin its slabber surface rating more than its eye appeal. The part that is important to me is the reverse figures are fighting and not just posing for the camera.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>M. Servilius C.f. </b>100 BC. AR Denarius Helmeted head of Roma right; Pi to left / Two warriors fighting on foot, each armed with sword and shield, horse prancing behind each; I in exergue. Crawford 327/1; Servilia 13. [ATTACH=full]772824[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The other is more specific showing the action of family pride was in the war in Sicily. This issue of 71 BC is the first appearance on a coin of the title IIIVIR (Triumvir). We add a few points for the obverse head not being the ordinary Roma but Virtus. In Republican terms, 'standing there' coins I prefer to avoid include Roma heads and someone driving a horse drawn chariot. There are just too many of that common type so it is nice to have something else. Here we see Manius son (filius) of Manius and grandson (nepos) of Manius the hero of Sicily. I find a bit of interest in the impression of the edge of the reverse die showing the size of the punch as it crosses the serrations at reverse left. Is Sicily holding something in her right hand or is that just an overly long arm?</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Mn. Aquillius Mn. f. Mn. n.</b> 71 BC. AR Denarius VIRTVS III VIR, helmeted bust of Virtus right / MN. AQVIL. MN. F. MN. N., the consul Man. Aquillius facing, head right, raising Sicilia. Crawford 401/1; Aquillia 2.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]772831[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3074024, member: 19463"]I have often expressed my strong aversion for coin types showing nothing more than someone standing there. I don't care if you are a major god from Olympus, don't just stand there, throw a thunderbolt or carry off a struggling maiden --- do something. My coin show purchases from yesterday included two Roman Republican types showing action heroes. Both were issued by junior, aspiring politicians who wanted you to associate them with a Roman hero who just happened to be their grandfather. At that time it was unacceptable to blow your own horn but pointing out that you were descended from a long line of saviors of the State was perfectly acceptable. The first of M. Servilius requires the viewer to know the details of the battle scene with two warriors fighting with hoses rearing in the background. Grandpa was a war hero. The coin has a dark tone concealing some nicks that would ruin its slabber surface rating more than its eye appeal. The part that is important to me is the reverse figures are fighting and not just posing for the camera. [B]M. Servilius C.f. [/B]100 BC. AR Denarius Helmeted head of Roma right; Pi to left / Two warriors fighting on foot, each armed with sword and shield, horse prancing behind each; I in exergue. Crawford 327/1; Servilia 13. [ATTACH=full]772824[/ATTACH] The other is more specific showing the action of family pride was in the war in Sicily. This issue of 71 BC is the first appearance on a coin of the title IIIVIR (Triumvir). We add a few points for the obverse head not being the ordinary Roma but Virtus. In Republican terms, 'standing there' coins I prefer to avoid include Roma heads and someone driving a horse drawn chariot. There are just too many of that common type so it is nice to have something else. Here we see Manius son (filius) of Manius and grandson (nepos) of Manius the hero of Sicily. I find a bit of interest in the impression of the edge of the reverse die showing the size of the punch as it crosses the serrations at reverse left. Is Sicily holding something in her right hand or is that just an overly long arm? [B]Mn. Aquillius Mn. f. Mn. n.[/B] 71 BC. AR Denarius VIRTVS III VIR, helmeted bust of Virtus right / MN. AQVIL. MN. F. MN. N., the consul Man. Aquillius facing, head right, raising Sicilia. Crawford 401/1; Aquillia 2. [ATTACH=full]772831[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Republicans doing things
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...