Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Representative selections
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2524896, member: 19463"]Mikey Zee posted the above to another thread but I moved it here to begin a new thread I hope will be found interesting at least to the general collectors among us. The question is what selection of coins would do well to represent a particular genre better than just a random handful of coins, in this case, Byzantine coins. I will post here what I consider to be an overview of Byzantines and note what I believe I am missing that would make my group a better representation of the whole. You are asked to tell me what you think I have overlooked or could have done better. </p><p><br /></p><p>My first Byzantine selection seems appropriately from Anastasius who coin people will call the first Byzantine Emperor even though his claim to fame is more that he issued the first large M folles than actually starting a new Empire. I was going to include an Anastasius follis but CT only allows ten images per post and I ran out of room. What I show for Anastasius is his last pre-Byzantine AE4 nummis that was so small that he decided that the big forty nummi denomination was a good idea. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]538777[/ATTACH] </p><p>We do have to have a need for one of the large M coins so we might as well have one of the largest ones from Justinian I year 13 or 14 when the peak was reached.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538780[/ATTACH] </p><p>...and a smaller denomination just to make the point that they existed. This is a ten nummi of Justinian.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538779[/ATTACH] </p><p>Next I feel the need for a coin that shows the emperor and empress together. This is a Justin II and Sophia 20 nummi (picked because it is a denomination not used above and also a third different mint city just to mix things up). </p><p>[ATTACH=full]538781[/ATTACH] </p><p>Somewhere along the way we need to acknowledge the fact that there were gold coins even though my collection habits and budget will not have many of them. This is a solidus of Focas. If your idea of a Byzantine collection is all gold, you might want to throw in a bronze here and there. I need a silver coin of this period but I do not have one.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538782[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Next I wanted to demonstrate that the later days of the big M coinage got smaller and messier with coins overstruck and clipped to keep up with the weight standards. When it comes to overstrikes my favorite is this triple with design showing from Heraculius, Focas and Tiberius Constantine. Most coins were overstruck but there is a special place in my heart for one that allow clear identification of the components.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538811[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This is a Constans II cut down from earlier coins. It is overstruck but the feature that gave it a place here is the straight clips around the edge.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538783[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Should we mention that Byzantine coins were copied by neighboring authorities like this bilingual one from Emesa?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538784[/ATTACH] </p><p>Along the way there are some really odd Byzantine side trips like this Basil II cast from Cherson.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538785[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>After the big M period ended we see folles with a lot of text on the reverse like this Leo VI.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]538786[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I should have known I could not do this in ten coins. The rest will follow.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2524896, member: 19463"]Mikey Zee posted the above to another thread but I moved it here to begin a new thread I hope will be found interesting at least to the general collectors among us. The question is what selection of coins would do well to represent a particular genre better than just a random handful of coins, in this case, Byzantine coins. I will post here what I consider to be an overview of Byzantines and note what I believe I am missing that would make my group a better representation of the whole. You are asked to tell me what you think I have overlooked or could have done better. My first Byzantine selection seems appropriately from Anastasius who coin people will call the first Byzantine Emperor even though his claim to fame is more that he issued the first large M folles than actually starting a new Empire. I was going to include an Anastasius follis but CT only allows ten images per post and I ran out of room. What I show for Anastasius is his last pre-Byzantine AE4 nummis that was so small that he decided that the big forty nummi denomination was a good idea. [ATTACH=full]538777[/ATTACH] We do have to have a need for one of the large M coins so we might as well have one of the largest ones from Justinian I year 13 or 14 when the peak was reached. [ATTACH=full]538780[/ATTACH] ...and a smaller denomination just to make the point that they existed. This is a ten nummi of Justinian. [ATTACH=full]538779[/ATTACH] Next I feel the need for a coin that shows the emperor and empress together. This is a Justin II and Sophia 20 nummi (picked because it is a denomination not used above and also a third different mint city just to mix things up). [ATTACH=full]538781[/ATTACH] Somewhere along the way we need to acknowledge the fact that there were gold coins even though my collection habits and budget will not have many of them. This is a solidus of Focas. If your idea of a Byzantine collection is all gold, you might want to throw in a bronze here and there. I need a silver coin of this period but I do not have one. [ATTACH=full]538782[/ATTACH] Next I wanted to demonstrate that the later days of the big M coinage got smaller and messier with coins overstruck and clipped to keep up with the weight standards. When it comes to overstrikes my favorite is this triple with design showing from Heraculius, Focas and Tiberius Constantine. Most coins were overstruck but there is a special place in my heart for one that allow clear identification of the components. [ATTACH=full]538811[/ATTACH] This is a Constans II cut down from earlier coins. It is overstruck but the feature that gave it a place here is the straight clips around the edge. [ATTACH=full]538783[/ATTACH] Should we mention that Byzantine coins were copied by neighboring authorities like this bilingual one from Emesa? [ATTACH=full]538784[/ATTACH] Along the way there are some really odd Byzantine side trips like this Basil II cast from Cherson. [ATTACH=full]538785[/ATTACH] After the big M period ended we see folles with a lot of text on the reverse like this Leo VI. [ATTACH=full]538786[/ATTACH] I should have known I could not do this in ten coins. The rest will follow.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Representative selections
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...