Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Repost of one of my Coin Week Counterfeit Articles
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8453856, member: 24314"]justafarmer, posted: "<b>This <span style="color: #b30000">would</span> also <span style="color: #b30000">require</span> a grading standard that remained static."</b></p><p><br /></p><p>It absolutely <b><span style="color: #b30000">WOULD NOT</span></b>!!!</p><p><br /></p><p>There is no static grading standard NOW and thousands of coins are</p><p> "professionally" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie18" alt=":bag:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> graded" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> every day. Once a coin is graded by "whatever the team of professional graders decide the grade is finalized into the computer forever UNTIL something is done to it to fool the computer or change its grade. Coins would need to be sent to another major TPGS for any chance to change the grade. If that TPGS also graded coins their way and "fingerprinted" the coin into a computer its grade would be set forever at that TPGS. That's what the obsolete "Technical System" approached. Coins were graded very strictly by their condition only. Any other factors that influenced its sight unseen ID were added. A pristine, flawless, well struck 1884-O was graded the same as as a pristine, flawless, flatly struck 84-O. One was graded MS-65 (the highest grade at the time) while the other was graded MS-65, Flat Strike. Both were absolutely virtually perfect as struck coins BUT ONE WAS WORTH A LOT MORE MONEY. Add splotchy, brown, low eye appeal to the flat coin and it became an MS-65, flatly struck, splotchy toned coin. Worth much less until it was dipped and the eye appeal was raised adding to its value again. We devised Technical Grading to ONLY IDENTIFY a coin, not to place a value on it. Coin dealers can do that. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is virtually impossible to have two coins with the same "fingerprint." You and other authenticators use "fingerprint" to ID marks. While this is also a part of computer grading everything else on the coin counts for the computer. Tat includes luster, color, strike, etc. Thus the tiny black "flecks" on the coin in the left slab is all it takes tp differentiate it from the coin on the right.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8453856, member: 24314"]justafarmer, posted: "[B]This [COLOR=#b30000]would[/COLOR] also [COLOR=#b30000]require[/COLOR] a grading standard that remained static."[/B] [B][/B] It absolutely [B][COLOR=#b30000]WOULD NOT[/COLOR][/B]!!! There is no static grading standard NOW and thousands of coins are "professionally" :bag: graded" :D every day. Once a coin is graded by "whatever the team of professional graders decide the grade is finalized into the computer forever UNTIL something is done to it to fool the computer or change its grade. Coins would need to be sent to another major TPGS for any chance to change the grade. If that TPGS also graded coins their way and "fingerprinted" the coin into a computer its grade would be set forever at that TPGS. That's what the obsolete "Technical System" approached. Coins were graded very strictly by their condition only. Any other factors that influenced its sight unseen ID were added. A pristine, flawless, well struck 1884-O was graded the same as as a pristine, flawless, flatly struck 84-O. One was graded MS-65 (the highest grade at the time) while the other was graded MS-65, Flat Strike. Both were absolutely virtually perfect as struck coins BUT ONE WAS WORTH A LOT MORE MONEY. Add splotchy, brown, low eye appeal to the flat coin and it became an MS-65, flatly struck, splotchy toned coin. Worth much less until it was dipped and the eye appeal was raised adding to its value again. We devised Technical Grading to ONLY IDENTIFY a coin, not to place a value on it. Coin dealers can do that. It is virtually impossible to have two coins with the same "fingerprint." You and other authenticators use "fingerprint" to ID marks. While this is also a part of computer grading everything else on the coin counts for the computer. Tat includes luster, color, strike, etc. Thus the tiny black "flecks" on the coin in the left slab is all it takes tp differentiate it from the coin on the right.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Repost of one of my Coin Week Counterfeit Articles
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...