Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Released the Ancient Green Giant!!!;)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1857027, member: 19463"]It is a nice coin; that was never in question. The question is how to apply grading standards that are woefully inadequate to the coin. I originally posted VF 4/4 and they said VF 4/5 which is amazingly close by my standards. I downgraded the coin due to the two cracks and minor fissures across the reverse surface. They did not let such things bother them. In all honesty, I might be inclined to use the services of NGC if they did not use those plastic coffins and if they did not charge so much for opinions without warranties. </p><p><br /></p><p>IMHO a VF coin should have fully separated laurel wreath elements but requires no detail within the leaves. This one barely qualifies but I decided the cause was a bit of flat strike so I dropped the first numeral to a 4. The obverse is a definite 5 surface but most sestertii of this period have metal issues like the ones on this reverse. If we call this a 5, what do we call a coin with no fissures? </p><p><br /></p><p>For the record, I consider the $200 a bit on the high side but not at all out of line considering some of the absolute junk I see offered for that much and more. This is a very nice coin and does not need inflated grading to make it a winner.</p><p><br /></p><p>A related question: The coin is weighed to .01g but slabbed so it can not again be weighed. Has anyone ever weighed a NGC coin after it was freed? I have owned two scales supposedly accurate to .01 and I own two reference 50g weights for use calibrating scales. The two weights are .06 different in weight from each other and the scales differ but by different amounts depending on what range they are weighing. I'm not sure it is reasonable to expect a cheap scale to be any more accurate at .01 level but wonder especially about the weight being so sloppy. If you want your eyes opened on such things, look at your US 5 cent coins that are supposed to weigh 5.000g (three 0's). Don't weigh old worn coins just new looking ones. One digit would have been plenty.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1857027, member: 19463"]It is a nice coin; that was never in question. The question is how to apply grading standards that are woefully inadequate to the coin. I originally posted VF 4/4 and they said VF 4/5 which is amazingly close by my standards. I downgraded the coin due to the two cracks and minor fissures across the reverse surface. They did not let such things bother them. In all honesty, I might be inclined to use the services of NGC if they did not use those plastic coffins and if they did not charge so much for opinions without warranties. IMHO a VF coin should have fully separated laurel wreath elements but requires no detail within the leaves. This one barely qualifies but I decided the cause was a bit of flat strike so I dropped the first numeral to a 4. The obverse is a definite 5 surface but most sestertii of this period have metal issues like the ones on this reverse. If we call this a 5, what do we call a coin with no fissures? For the record, I consider the $200 a bit on the high side but not at all out of line considering some of the absolute junk I see offered for that much and more. This is a very nice coin and does not need inflated grading to make it a winner. A related question: The coin is weighed to .01g but slabbed so it can not again be weighed. Has anyone ever weighed a NGC coin after it was freed? I have owned two scales supposedly accurate to .01 and I own two reference 50g weights for use calibrating scales. The two weights are .06 different in weight from each other and the scales differ but by different amounts depending on what range they are weighing. I'm not sure it is reasonable to expect a cheap scale to be any more accurate at .01 level but wonder especially about the weight being so sloppy. If you want your eyes opened on such things, look at your US 5 cent coins that are supposed to weigh 5.000g (three 0's). Don't weigh old worn coins just new looking ones. One digit would have been plenty.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Released the Ancient Green Giant!!!;)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...