Just one more for today. The old image was good, but after the crash, all I could find was this smaller image. So now it's corrected. OLD NEW PROBUS Antoninianus OBVERSE: IMP PROBVS AVG, radiate mantled bust left holding eagle-tipped sceptre REVERSE: SOLI INVICTO, Sol in galloping quadriga left, R-thunderbolt-B in ex. Struck at Rome, 275-6 AD 4.2g, 24mm RIC 202
OLD NEW CARINUS Antoninianus OBVERSE: IMP CARINVS P F AVG, radiate cuirassed bust right REVERSE: FIDES MILITVM, Fides standing left with a standard in each hand. KAEpsilon in ex. Struck at Rome, 284-5 AD 2.9g, 22mm RIC V-2, 253
The first was the seller's image and totally wrong. I didn't think this one was "fuzzy", but I'll redo it one more time. In the meantime, take a look at the difference between the seller's image and mine on this coin. You might not even guess they are the same coin: OLD (Seller's) NEW (Mine) CARINUS Antoninianus OBVERSE: M AVR CARINVS NOB C, radiate draped and cuirassed bust right REVERSE: PRINCIPI IVVENTVT, prince standing left holding globe and spear with captive at foot left. TXXI in ex. Struck at Ticinum, 282-3 AD 3.5g, 23mm RIC 182t
OK. I have re-shot the Carinus you said was "fuzzy". This time I angled the camera so as to allow more light to the coin. The image is lighter because of that, but still represents the coin very well. Let me know if you think it is still "fuzzy".
Looks better to my eyes, a little more light like you added in the second reshoot makes the coin look better IMHO. Kudos!
Well, it just goes to show how different eyes (and tastes) see different things. I like the first one better, and I don't think it's fuzzy.
Whew, I didn't either. I was sure I must need new glasses. I even asked my wife to take a look. She said she couldn't see much difference between the two other than the light.
I don't know what else to tell ya, maybe its a factor of Contrast but I am constantly battling this, where the photo is not sharp and all edges appear soft.
I'm back with another. You know, I have to wonder why I was satisfied with the seller's image on many of my coins. This one has a huge difference between images: OLD NEW (beautiful chocolate/green patina that does not show on the seller's image above) CARAUSIUS Antoninianus OBVERSE: IMP C CARAVSIVS PF I AVG, draped, cuirassed, and radiate bust r REVERSE: PAX AVG, Pax stg. l. holding olive branch & vertical scepter, S P in l. & r. fields Struck at Camulodunum 290-3 AD 3.58g, 23.8 mm RIC 482
That's a great bust of Carausius - it has the haughtiness you would expect from a usurper. This is my country now, mine! I'm king of the hill!
I kind of wanted to keep show off my Ostrogoth reshoot here. It makes it nice when I want to go back and look at the before and after of different types of coins and surfaces. This thread is really become a serious learning experience for me as well as other members I am sure. I come to appreciate coins I have not in a while and have had "new coin" feeling quite a few times doing my reshoot project. This particular image upgrade I am oober happy with. I love the coin so much more now, faults and all. Kingdom of the Ostrogoths Rome, Italy (s.493-526 AD) AE Follis (40 Nummi) 23 mm x 10.19 grams Obverse: INVICT-A ROMA Helmeted bust of Roma right. Reverse: She-wolf suckling Romulus and Remus, XL above Ref: COI 82a, BMC 24 Prov.ex. J.C. Collection 2014 Note: Very Rare. OLD NEW
That's exactly my point. So many times I buy a coin and appreciate it for a while till the next NP comes along. Then it gets filed away and only the images are ever examined and posted. Re-imaging all my coins is giving me the chance to see and feel all my coins again. And, yes, I do get that "new coin feeling" a lot.