Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Rediscovering the joy of collecting
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="68KennedyHalf, post: 788469, member: 22306"]I've been compiling a series of year sets after not having taken part in the hobby since childhood, and I've been surprised at how enjoyable it's been. My childhood collection was very small -- just the Wheaties and older Jeffs I managed to find in circulation, and the 1918 Wheatie my grandfather gave me.</p><p><br /></p><p>Certain coins that I admired as a kid but never owned have been dazzling to see up close -- like Mercury Dimes, which I always thought of as the coolest. </p><p><br /></p><p>What's been really fun, though, is discovering new favorites. I thought the Standing Liberty Quarter looked good in photos I'd seen, but somehow I have a new appreciation for it now that I can see it in person. The one I have is a 1920-S described as being in EF-40 condition, and I really notice Liberty's chain mail in a way I'm not sure I had before. The shield, too. And I think the eagle on the reverse might be my favorite of all the eagles I've seen on coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also love the IHC all of a sudden now that I own two of them. Profoundly simple and elegant, I think.</p><p><br /></p><p>Most surprising has been my reaction to the Barber Half. The Barber series never did anything for me in all the examples I'd seen in print and online. I bought two in VG condition, and they actually seem pretty nice. I'm not sure why. I think the eagle on the back is well done, and there's just something dignified about the coin. I'm a fan of halves in general, because of the size, so maybe that has something to do with it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Then there's the Morgan. I have an 1890 and a 1900-O, and again, it seems like the photos I've seen, well-taken though many have been, don't do it justice. Just really a beautiful design. And the heft of it; it really is too bad people found the large dollar coin such a hassle. I personally think it'd be easier, to take a couple of dollar coins out of my pocket than to reach into my back pocket for my wallet, open it, take out a bill, etc. But maybe that's just me. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Apologies for not including photos here. I'm in the process of getting a new camera, and even when I do it may be a while before I feel competent enough to display pictures on CT. I tried scanning my 1900 Morgan, but it just ended up looking weird; it's just as well that I couldn't enlarge the images on my profile page. :goof:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="68KennedyHalf, post: 788469, member: 22306"]I've been compiling a series of year sets after not having taken part in the hobby since childhood, and I've been surprised at how enjoyable it's been. My childhood collection was very small -- just the Wheaties and older Jeffs I managed to find in circulation, and the 1918 Wheatie my grandfather gave me. Certain coins that I admired as a kid but never owned have been dazzling to see up close -- like Mercury Dimes, which I always thought of as the coolest. What's been really fun, though, is discovering new favorites. I thought the Standing Liberty Quarter looked good in photos I'd seen, but somehow I have a new appreciation for it now that I can see it in person. The one I have is a 1920-S described as being in EF-40 condition, and I really notice Liberty's chain mail in a way I'm not sure I had before. The shield, too. And I think the eagle on the reverse might be my favorite of all the eagles I've seen on coinage. I also love the IHC all of a sudden now that I own two of them. Profoundly simple and elegant, I think. Most surprising has been my reaction to the Barber Half. The Barber series never did anything for me in all the examples I'd seen in print and online. I bought two in VG condition, and they actually seem pretty nice. I'm not sure why. I think the eagle on the back is well done, and there's just something dignified about the coin. I'm a fan of halves in general, because of the size, so maybe that has something to do with it. Then there's the Morgan. I have an 1890 and a 1900-O, and again, it seems like the photos I've seen, well-taken though many have been, don't do it justice. Just really a beautiful design. And the heft of it; it really is too bad people found the large dollar coin such a hassle. I personally think it'd be easier, to take a couple of dollar coins out of my pocket than to reach into my back pocket for my wallet, open it, take out a bill, etc. But maybe that's just me. :rolleyes: Apologies for not including photos here. I'm in the process of getting a new camera, and even when I do it may be a while before I feel competent enough to display pictures on CT. I tried scanning my 1900 Morgan, but it just ended up looking weird; it's just as well that I couldn't enlarge the images on my profile page. :goof:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Rediscovering the joy of collecting
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...