Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Reconstructing the Legends on a Samaritan Æ 21 of Julia Soaemias
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2985638, member: 75937"]I purchased this <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=711377" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=711377" rel="nofollow">coin from Stack's</a> some years ago and, after researching it online, have been able to reconstruct its legends. The coin is from Sebaste, which received the status of a Roman colony under the name <i>Lucia Septimia Sebaste</i> around the year 201/202. We know this from numismatic evidence: SNG ANS 1080, a coin of Julia Domna from that year, has the Latin legends of subsequent colonial coinage, but the reverse is still in Greek, with no colonial title. Septimius Severus revoked the city of Neopolis' colonial standing for supporting Pescennius Niger and subsequently awarded colonial status to Sebaste for supporting him (Barbara Burrell, <i>Neokoroi: Greek Cities and Roman Emperors. </i>Brill 2003, p. 261). Sear (<i>Greek Imperial Coins</i>, p. 618) notes a Latin legend reading COL. L. SEP. SEBASTE for coins of this city. We should therefore expect some variation of this legend on my coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>All four examples (including the Rosenberger plate coin) appear have been struck from a single obverse die. There are possibly two different reverse dies represented.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have been able to find only three examples of this coin online.</p><p><br /></p><p>First, there is mine:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]735389[/ATTACH]</p><p>Julia Soaemias, AD 218-222</p><p>Roman Provincial AE 21.4 mm, 12.48 g</p><p>Samaria, Sebaste, AD 218-222</p><p>Obv: SVΛEMIAS ΛV[GVSTΛ] SEB, bare-headed and draped bust, r.</p><p>Rev: COL• L• SE• [SEB• ASTE•], temple of the Capitoline Jupiter* with four columns; Jupiter standing in center between Athena and Hera. Wreath within pediment</p><p>Ref: Rosenberger 36 (die match); Price & Trell 786; SNG ANS 1083</p><p><br /></p><p><font size="3">*You can read a very interesting article about this temple <a href="https://smarthistory.org/jupiter-optimus/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://smarthistory.org/jupiter-optimus/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</font></p><p><br /></p><p>Stack's noted it was a die match to Rosenberger 36. The coin is missing some of the legends on both sides. It also appears that there isn't any text in the exergue. However, comparison to another, but die-matched, coin, allows us to reconstruct the entire obverse legend and most of the reverse legend as well.</p><p><br /></p><p>My coin is an obverse and reverse die match to this coin, <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=102357" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=102357" rel="nofollow">sold at auction by CNG</a> on May 22, 2002, and <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=775523" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=775523" rel="nofollow">noted by Stack's when resold</a> in 2010 that it had been the property of Cornelius C. Vermeule. It was <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3287669" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3287669" rel="nofollow">resold again by CNG</a> in March, 2013, noting it had been the property of Patrick H. C. Tan. This coin has definitely been around the block a few times.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]735393[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This is an attractive and well-centered example, and it demonstrates the legend to the right of the temple reads SEB, probably followed by a dot. It also demonstrates there is, in fact, text in the exergue, probably ASTE followed by a dot. The flan is small and none of the dotted circle forming the border of the design -- clearly visible on my example -- appears on the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>The third example was sold at a <a href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=118535" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=118535" rel="nofollow">CNG e-auction</a> and was once part of the J. S. Wagner Collection. It is an obverse die-match to the two preceding coins (and thus to the Rosenberger plate coin). And while CNG claims it's a die match to the Rosenberger coin (by which I assume they mean a reverse die match as well), I am not convinced it's a reverse die match to the above coins. The angle of the pediment is steeper and the figures within the temple appear somewhat different in posture. I think that two reverse dies are represented among these three coins, but I can't say that with certainty.</p><p><br /></p><p>Nonetheless, it allows us to reconstruct the exergue of the coin as reading ASTE• or ΛSTE•. It also looks like there is no dot after the SEB on the right-hand side on this particular die.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]735392[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Post anything you feel is relevant![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Roman Collector, post: 2985638, member: 75937"]I purchased this [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=711377']coin from Stack's[/URL] some years ago and, after researching it online, have been able to reconstruct its legends. The coin is from Sebaste, which received the status of a Roman colony under the name [I]Lucia Septimia Sebaste[/I] around the year 201/202. We know this from numismatic evidence: SNG ANS 1080, a coin of Julia Domna from that year, has the Latin legends of subsequent colonial coinage, but the reverse is still in Greek, with no colonial title. Septimius Severus revoked the city of Neopolis' colonial standing for supporting Pescennius Niger and subsequently awarded colonial status to Sebaste for supporting him (Barbara Burrell, [I]Neokoroi: Greek Cities and Roman Emperors. [/I]Brill 2003, p. 261). Sear ([I]Greek Imperial Coins[/I], p. 618) notes a Latin legend reading COL. L. SEP. SEBASTE for coins of this city. We should therefore expect some variation of this legend on my coin. All four examples (including the Rosenberger plate coin) appear have been struck from a single obverse die. There are possibly two different reverse dies represented. I have been able to find only three examples of this coin online. First, there is mine: [ATTACH=full]735389[/ATTACH] Julia Soaemias, AD 218-222 Roman Provincial AE 21.4 mm, 12.48 g Samaria, Sebaste, AD 218-222 Obv: SVΛEMIAS ΛV[GVSTΛ] SEB, bare-headed and draped bust, r. Rev: COL• L• SE• [SEB• ASTE•], temple of the Capitoline Jupiter* with four columns; Jupiter standing in center between Athena and Hera. Wreath within pediment Ref: Rosenberger 36 (die match); Price & Trell 786; SNG ANS 1083 [SIZE=3]*You can read a very interesting article about this temple [URL='https://smarthistory.org/jupiter-optimus/']here[/URL].[/SIZE] Stack's noted it was a die match to Rosenberger 36. The coin is missing some of the legends on both sides. It also appears that there isn't any text in the exergue. However, comparison to another, but die-matched, coin, allows us to reconstruct the entire obverse legend and most of the reverse legend as well. My coin is an obverse and reverse die match to this coin, [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=102357']sold at auction by CNG[/URL] on May 22, 2002, and [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=775523']noted by Stack's when resold[/URL] in 2010 that it had been the property of Cornelius C. Vermeule. It was [URL='https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=3287669']resold again by CNG[/URL] in March, 2013, noting it had been the property of Patrick H. C. Tan. This coin has definitely been around the block a few times. [ATTACH=full]735393[/ATTACH] This is an attractive and well-centered example, and it demonstrates the legend to the right of the temple reads SEB, probably followed by a dot. It also demonstrates there is, in fact, text in the exergue, probably ASTE followed by a dot. The flan is small and none of the dotted circle forming the border of the design -- clearly visible on my example -- appears on the coin. The third example was sold at a [URL='https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=118535']CNG e-auction[/URL] and was once part of the J. S. Wagner Collection. It is an obverse die-match to the two preceding coins (and thus to the Rosenberger plate coin). And while CNG claims it's a die match to the Rosenberger coin (by which I assume they mean a reverse die match as well), I am not convinced it's a reverse die match to the above coins. The angle of the pediment is steeper and the figures within the temple appear somewhat different in posture. I think that two reverse dies are represented among these three coins, but I can't say that with certainty. Nonetheless, it allows us to reconstruct the exergue of the coin as reading ASTE• or ΛSTE•. It also looks like there is no dot after the SEB on the right-hand side on this particular die. [ATTACH=full]735392[/ATTACH] Post anything you feel is relevant![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Reconstructing the Legends on a Samaritan Æ 21 of Julia Soaemias
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...