Recent mistakes in my Coin World columns

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by mikediamond, Jul 29, 2018.

  1. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    I just wanted to alert you to some mistakes I made in recent Collector's Clearinghouse columns:

    In the column on guided die scratches, I was supposed to have been discussing a 1986 cent, not a 1989 cent.

    At certain points in this week's column on ambiguous misalignments, I confused the concept of planchet position with off-center strike (a planchet shift in one direction will result in an off-center strike in the opposite direction). I also totally fouled up my discussion of clock positions with regard to the 1983-P quarter. So here are the necessary corrections:

    "The November 28, 2011 column featured a 1999-D 5-cent coin that seemed to have misalignments of both dies in opposite directions (see photo). Instead, it was interpreted as the product of a major misalignment of the hammer (obverse) die toward the left and a planchet that was shifted in the same direction but for a smaller distance.

    Let’s now consider another an ambiguous misalignment. This 1983-P quarter dollar was struck off-center and shows a reverse design that is out of alignment with the obverse design. The maximum distance from edge of the coin to the inferred edge of the reverse field is 3 millimeters while the same measurement to the edge of the obverse field is only 2 millimeters. There are three possible explanations:

    1. A centered planchet combined with a misalignment of the hammer (obverse) die toward 1:00 (obverse clock position) and a larger misalignment of the anvil (reverse) die toward 5:00 (reverse clock position, or the same direction in vertical space).

    2. A planchet positioned off-center toward 7:00 (ocp), in combination with a horizontal misalignment of the anvil die toward 5:00 (rcp).

    3. A planchet positioned off-center toward 7:00 (ocp) and a smaller misalignment of the hammer die toward 7:00 (ocp).

    Since off-center strikes are exceedingly common among 1983 quarter dollars, and since misalignments of the anvil die are rare overall and unknown for this year, the third explanation would seem the most likely."


    Sorry about the unnecessary headaches my muddled thinking may have caused.
    .
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Need more coffee? LOL
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  4. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    I don't drink coffee. Maybe I should start. :)
     
  5. Hot damn, the only refered name of a specialist I’ve ever heard come out of the mouth of another numismatist( John A. Wexler)... rare indeed! —Malachi 3:10–
     
  6. Mike Diamonds Hangout / Coin Talk ... carries it’s own domain on the search engine results.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page