Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;airedale, post: 189261, member: 4695&quot;]I do not appreciate you editing my post behind the cloak of being a moderator. Had the defendants prevailed this would have been headline news instead of being swept under the carpet and only brought forward on this forum two months after the fact.</p><p><br /></p><p>I like Condor101&#039;s take on this matter on another forum, even if it is not favorable to ACG.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot; &lt;&lt; ACG cannot claim victory in this, of that I am sure. &gt;&gt;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I would disagree. If they received a monetary settlement they won no matter what the amount. (Most likely their lawyer was on contingency. I can&#039;t imagine ACG would be able to actually be paying his legal bills all this time otherwise. If not the only way ACG lost was if the settlement didn&#039;t cover his legal bills. Even if the settlement just covered his bills he still won. See next comment.)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>&lt;&lt; Terms of the settlement were not disclosed, but I am virtually certain that none of the defendants lost money, which was the reason for the lawsuit, in the first place. &gt;&gt;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The plaintiff didn&#039;t care if the defendants lost money or not, he was interested in getting money no matter what the source was. He wouldn&#039;t care if it came from the defendant or their insurance company. As for the reason for the lawsuit, I would bet at least part of the reason for it was to cause turmoil, and at that he succeeded. Yes, ACG won. &quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Back to me. I hope they got multi millions for the pain &amp; shame they were publicly put through. But the proceedings being <i>in camera</i> I doubt if we will ever know.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in