Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;+VGO.DVCKS, post: 7929636, member: 110504&quot;]Fascinating, [USER=56653]@seth77[/USER], not to mention a cogent, resonantly contextualized argument.&nbsp; ...But Wait!&nbsp; Duplessy (Tome I, 2004) had already reassigned this issue to Mahaut I (762) --albeit, typically, without commentary of any kind (762).&nbsp; More reason to see Duplessy as only a discrete improvement on Boudeau.</p><p>Here&#039;s my example.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1370855[/ATTACH]</p><p>(Edit: ) To your point about increasing Capetian regulation of feudal issues from Philippe II into the rest of the 13th century, I&#039;ve noticed that it&#039;s from the 13th century that you start seeing fleurs de lis on feudal issues.&nbsp; If you have any interpretive light to shed on that, it would be highly welcome.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in