Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
real shekel or not
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="iamtiberius, post: 3357107, member: 37707"]Your Coin: <b>PHOENICIA, Tyre. </b>126/5 BC-AD 65/6. AR Shekel. Dated year 29 (98/7 BC). Laureate bust of Melkart right, [lion skin around neck] / Eagle standing left on prow; palm frond in background; to left, ΘK (date) above club; monogram to right; Phoenician A between legs. DCA-Tyre 73; Rouvier 2011; HGC 10, 357; DCA 919.</p><p><br /></p><p>Below is your coin side by side with CNG's example that was auctioned in 2017 (Sold for $1770 w/ buyer's premium)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]889248[/ATTACH]</p><p>Yours is a reverse die match with CNG's example.</p><p>- Note the faint horizontal line that runs to the left and just at head level with the eagle. This is a good sign and shows that both of your coins shared the same die scratch/imperfection.</p><p>-Note at the tip of the bottom 2 tail feathers how the metal is pushed up to the edge of the flan. Another good sign showing the metal naturally flowing to the point of least resistance when being struck. The CNG example was struck when the die was younger; ergo, yours was later.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]889250[/ATTACH]</p><p>The obverses are not die matches; which is probably the best sign. It would be very uncommon for forgers to mix and match dies; though it has occurred before.</p><p>- Note that the flans are of different shapes and struck differently. A good sign.</p><p>- The CNG example weighs 14.40 grams. I would recommend weighing yours to look for a little disparity between the 2.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]889247[/ATTACH]</p><p>CNG Shekel, E-Auction 394, Lot 297</p><p>14.4 grams</p><p><br /></p><p>Source: <a href="https://cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=332361" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=332361" rel="nofollow">https://cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=332361</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b>Prognosis: I lean, heavily, toward genuine. </b></p><p>Nice coin. I don't have one yet. The Alpha/Lambda over a tipped epsilon seems to be a rarer monogram than the traditionally oriented [ATTACH=full]889260[/ATTACH] monogram, more commonly found on year 29 shekels. (Yours and the CNG example are the only examples I could find with the vertically oriented monogram.)</p><p><br /></p><p>- Michael[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="iamtiberius, post: 3357107, member: 37707"]Your Coin: [B]PHOENICIA, Tyre. [/B]126/5 BC-AD 65/6. AR Shekel. Dated year 29 (98/7 BC). Laureate bust of Melkart right, [lion skin around neck] / Eagle standing left on prow; palm frond in background; to left, ΘK (date) above club; monogram to right; Phoenician A between legs. DCA-Tyre 73; Rouvier 2011; HGC 10, 357; DCA 919. Below is your coin side by side with CNG's example that was auctioned in 2017 (Sold for $1770 w/ buyer's premium) [ATTACH=full]889248[/ATTACH] Yours is a reverse die match with CNG's example. - Note the faint horizontal line that runs to the left and just at head level with the eagle. This is a good sign and shows that both of your coins shared the same die scratch/imperfection. -Note at the tip of the bottom 2 tail feathers how the metal is pushed up to the edge of the flan. Another good sign showing the metal naturally flowing to the point of least resistance when being struck. The CNG example was struck when the die was younger; ergo, yours was later. [ATTACH=full]889250[/ATTACH] The obverses are not die matches; which is probably the best sign. It would be very uncommon for forgers to mix and match dies; though it has occurred before. - Note that the flans are of different shapes and struck differently. A good sign. - The CNG example weighs 14.40 grams. I would recommend weighing yours to look for a little disparity between the 2. [ATTACH=full]889247[/ATTACH] CNG Shekel, E-Auction 394, Lot 297 14.4 grams Source: [url]https://cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=332361[/url] [B]Prognosis: I lean, heavily, toward genuine. [/B] Nice coin. I don't have one yet. The Alpha/Lambda over a tipped epsilon seems to be a rarer monogram than the traditionally oriented [ATTACH=full]889260[/ATTACH] monogram, more commonly found on year 29 shekels. (Yours and the CNG example are the only examples I could find with the vertically oriented monogram.) - Michael[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
real shekel or not
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...