Real or fake 1932 s quarters

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by andrew2004gto, Mar 11, 2017.

  1. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    The mintmarks look like the right shape, very blocky, and on the higher grade coin I think I see some die polish around it which is good. Both mintmarks seem to be sitting in a little recessed area which looks correct as well.
     
    SchwaVB57 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. andrew2004gto

    andrew2004gto Member

    Paid 99 for the better one and 67 for the other. Wasn't planning on buying two but thought the better one would of went for more on an auction so I put a bid in.
     
  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    32-D? What have I missed? I'm seeing two S mint examples...
     
  5. andrew2004gto

    andrew2004gto Member

    I said they look better than my 1932-d lol. Making fun of it because its pretty bad condition.
     

    Attached Files:

    Michael K likes this.
  6. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Oy... Of course I only now see your earlier post. :)

    And I wouldn't worry much about the S examples. Nothing I see suggests them to be anything other than what they appear to be.
     
  7. sakata

    sakata Devil's Advocate

    Means it doesn't have fungus growing on it.
     
  8. andrew2004gto

    andrew2004gto Member

    Ha, just realized I said uncultivated, most be the farmer talking. I'm a farmer in Nebraska and we farm around 2500 to 3000 acres, my father and me.
     
  9. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    No sarcasm. I like the 34-D and when you previously posted it in an older thread as well. I don't mind circulated coins and that is the 2nd best date in the series.
    On the new photos that 2 looks bad in the 3rd pic.
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2017
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page