Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
READ THIS! The Next Generation Of Chinese Counterfeits Have Arrived
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="OldGoldGuy, post: 2137391, member: 72697"]Funny you should ask. I didn't realize it when I typed that statement that the OP is a mod as well. Which is my fault, I knew he was yesterday, the day before that, I just took him as simply the OP in this thread and forgot his request to not diagnose and in turn tell the forgers, was that of of a moderator. </p><p><br /></p><p>Keep in mind my belief is that silencing free speech (even on this site diagnosing the coins flaws wouldn't be breaking a forum rule) is criminal in nature. Being a private site, it is just bad policy, but not much forum members can do about it. And you are right, TWO MODERATORS think that by diagnosing a counterfeit coins flaws would be assisting the forgers; and that bringing that knowledge to this sites members is less important; <i>which basically adheres less to the purpose of this site.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>If a moderator thinks that the forgers are going to learn how to perfect their craft from CoinTalk, that suggests a very, extremely, incorrect view of reality. You can dress it up as "your opinion" but that is ridiculous. If your "opinion" of our sun was that it is green in color, well, your opinion would be WRONG bossman. </p><p><br /></p><p>When I think of a moderator, I think of an unbiased party, whose goals should be to have a forum reflect the sites original or current intent. In this case, the study and increasing of numismatic knowledge. Spin it however you want, by not informing your members, or allowing, or REQUESTING, or AGREEING with that "do not identify policy," you are allowing your members to potentially be ripped off. What, you thought this was the forgers best and final iteration unless his mistakes were caught by him/her on CoinTalk? And now you're bringing them out of retirement by identifying the flaws to allow them to sharpen it up a little bit more for version 2.0? No. No. No Man. </p><p><br /></p><p>As Costanza would say:</p><p> "THE EGO!"</p><p><br /></p><p>On a side note, after reading some comments of those that had issue with the "gag order" I have nothing bad to say about the Dutchman. I find his threads and comments to be well worth the read, especially the "Look What Walked Into The Shop" one. However, owning a business outside of the CoinTalk family of business entities, and being a moderator for a numismatic site DOES seem like it is approaching, crowding, hovering on, brushing, etc, the line.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="OldGoldGuy, post: 2137391, member: 72697"]Funny you should ask. I didn't realize it when I typed that statement that the OP is a mod as well. Which is my fault, I knew he was yesterday, the day before that, I just took him as simply the OP in this thread and forgot his request to not diagnose and in turn tell the forgers, was that of of a moderator. Keep in mind my belief is that silencing free speech (even on this site diagnosing the coins flaws wouldn't be breaking a forum rule) is criminal in nature. Being a private site, it is just bad policy, but not much forum members can do about it. And you are right, TWO MODERATORS think that by diagnosing a counterfeit coins flaws would be assisting the forgers; and that bringing that knowledge to this sites members is less important; [I]which basically adheres less to the purpose of this site.[/I] If a moderator thinks that the forgers are going to learn how to perfect their craft from CoinTalk, that suggests a very, extremely, incorrect view of reality. You can dress it up as "your opinion" but that is ridiculous. If your "opinion" of our sun was that it is green in color, well, your opinion would be WRONG bossman. When I think of a moderator, I think of an unbiased party, whose goals should be to have a forum reflect the sites original or current intent. In this case, the study and increasing of numismatic knowledge. Spin it however you want, by not informing your members, or allowing, or REQUESTING, or AGREEING with that "do not identify policy," you are allowing your members to potentially be ripped off. What, you thought this was the forgers best and final iteration unless his mistakes were caught by him/her on CoinTalk? And now you're bringing them out of retirement by identifying the flaws to allow them to sharpen it up a little bit more for version 2.0? No. No. No Man. As Costanza would say: "THE EGO!" On a side note, after reading some comments of those that had issue with the "gag order" I have nothing bad to say about the Dutchman. I find his threads and comments to be well worth the read, especially the "Look What Walked Into The Shop" one. However, owning a business outside of the CoinTalk family of business entities, and being a moderator for a numismatic site DOES seem like it is approaching, crowding, hovering on, brushing, etc, the line.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
READ THIS! The Next Generation Of Chinese Counterfeits Have Arrived
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...