So then if a doubled hub would be needed to reestablish what was lost from the 1963 die face. Like the two.
Yes, very nice photos, but I'm sorry (yawn) . . . if I had to look that closely to enjoy coins, I'd look for another hobby.
I will make a non-jovial answer to your post. No one understands what you are talking about. Although you might have little respect for many of the people on this forum, they include many VERY seasoned collectors and quite a few who make their living in the field and are considered experts. You use terminology that doesn't make sense, is English your primary language? BTW, that looks like Machine Doubling.
Of which the reasons for executions examples wouldn’t have ranged in that area for the mints need to include in the execution’s examples.... just cause you see one thing doesn’t you know what the mints need to do something in another
Very well said! Thank you. I would encourage the poster to enlist some writing assistance - perhaps a retired English Teacher would be willing to assist.
@Bobs Tavern Arm Coins replicate die extrusion only when die stages manifest subcutaneous reeding. Should clashes or abrasions dictate dual hub doubling, the inclusions don't necessarily quantify a qualitative out of collar strike. If you have no idea what I just said, welcome to our world reading your nonsensical comments.
