ICG uses "BR" (Brown-Red) on coins like that. Long, long ago, in a Galaxy far away copper was Red, Red-Brown, and Brown. If any trace of Red remained, it was Red Brown. So very easy to assign a description. RED/RED-BROWN----------------------------------------------------/BROWN.
Could go either way but I would guess BN. And if you do get it in a 64BN holder, I recommend holding out for more than $200. That date is extremely difficult to find designated MS BN let alone with color.
I don't want to be a Kiljoy, but I'm not sure this will grab a 64. The obverse looks like it has scrapes across the hair, carbon spotting and something yucky between the ends of the wheat stalks at the bottom. Kind of taking a chance with the associated fees just to come back as less than what you expected or wanted. JMHO.
I think the blue toning on the reverse shows scratches on the left side and there is a thin ink mark on RI in AMERICA. Personally, I wouldn't send it in for grading. You may get a Details grade on it.
I don't think it's ink. Could it be a retained struck thru thread or something? Just follows the topography too well IMO.
Yes, in RD. There’s some very competitive registry collectors who pursue the BN designated coins which inflates the values. There’s only a handful of them graded at 64BN or above which creates the seemingly bonkers premiums. I think based on PCGS stating 5% or more original red would make the OP coin RB, but the 65BN plate coin for this date looks to have more than 5% too (though only one one side?), so who knows. Either way I would say a worthy gamble.
Here is one I have graded 65BN also with more than 5% original red, looks RB to me, who knows how they decide...