Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2251422, member: 1892&quot;]Well, if it&#039;s fake it is a really, really good one. Little things like the odd bottom-heavy look of the date, and accurate representation of the slightest of strike weakness (this was one well-struck example when minted) beginning on the eagle&#039;s left foot argue in favor of authenticity. The dies are correct; you will only fail to see a Type Two Obverse on 1875-CC and this one&#039;s Type One/Type One anyway.</p><p><br /></p><p>The only problem - and it&#039;s only a problem so far, &quot;dealbreaker&quot; status for the problem isn&#039;t certain yet - is the mint mark. This is a different position than the one linked by BooksB4Coins, and so far I&#039;ve yet to see it in another example. With that said, I&#039;m not even fifty coins into research yet and with a million and a half minted it wouldn&#039;t floor me to note a previously-unknown mint mark location either.</p><p><br /></p><p>So call me &quot;cautiously optimistic.&quot; For now.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in