Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2251334, member: 36230&quot;]First, thank you... this is what makes these threads better; a willingness to respectfully discuss.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, you seem to be going on the assumption that only one mint mark style was used. Is this true, or could it be that there were two/others? I will say that this info is out there and goes to the point of why what I was trying to convey to the other gentleman, regardless of what some other may think, is in fact important. Just food for thought....</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a link you might want to take a look at....</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://coins.ha.com/itm/trade-dollars/silver-and-related-dollars/1875-cc-t-1-improperly-cleaned-obverse-scratched-ncs-unc-details-ngc-census-12-123-pcgs-population-12-145-minta/a/1122-8666.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coins.ha.com/itm/trade-dollars/silver-and-related-dollars/1875-cc-t-1-improperly-cleaned-obverse-scratched-ncs-unc-details-ngc-census-12-123-pcgs-population-12-145-minta/a/1122-8666.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515" rel="nofollow">http://coins.ha.com/itm/trade-dollars/silver-and-related-dollars/1875-cc-t-1-improperly-cleaned-obverse-scratched-ncs-unc-details-ngc-census-12-123-pcgs-population-12-145-minta/a/1122-8666.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515</a></p><p><br /></p><p>For the sake of fairness, I&#039;m presently using a mobile device which is less than ideal for such comparisons. However, from what I can see, the date position&nbsp; (which is further to the right than usual) and the mintmark positions seem a match although I cannot say for sure until able to view on an actual computer. Please take a look and share your thoughts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in