Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Rarity of Ancient Coins.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Terence Cheesman, post: 3497321, member: 86498"]I won this coin which was in Kuenker Auction 318 and it finally arrived on Thursday[ATTACH=full]926575[/ATTACH] So I look up the coin in the new RIC and find it referenced as No. 552 and is listed as an R2. In the first edition of RIC it is listed as No. 99 and "scarce". The R2 reference suggests that the coin is rare and is known by only a few specimens and a few dies.I then checked the various internet search engines and found two examples listed mine which was in Kuenker and previously in a Baldwins auction and a second specimen sold in a Gemini auction previously in a Freeman & Sear auction. Both coins share the same dies as the RIC specimen pictured in the book. So far so good. Okay Looks like I got something rare. </p><p> Well maybe maybe not. I got one reference, and search engines that start at best in the late 1990's. Furthermore these search engines are rather limited and while they do cover a large number of auctions do rather more poorly with FPLs and on line operations like Ebay and V Coins. Another factor might be that this is a variation on a fairly common theme within the coinage of Domitian, an reverse featuring Minerva. Because of this, the coin may not have been thought suitable for presentation in an important auction. So when dealing with such a coin I would advise caution. This coin may be rare but there is the possibility that it is not. PS I bought the coin because I liked it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Terence Cheesman, post: 3497321, member: 86498"]I won this coin which was in Kuenker Auction 318 and it finally arrived on Thursday[ATTACH=full]926575[/ATTACH] So I look up the coin in the new RIC and find it referenced as No. 552 and is listed as an R2. In the first edition of RIC it is listed as No. 99 and "scarce". The R2 reference suggests that the coin is rare and is known by only a few specimens and a few dies.I then checked the various internet search engines and found two examples listed mine which was in Kuenker and previously in a Baldwins auction and a second specimen sold in a Gemini auction previously in a Freeman & Sear auction. Both coins share the same dies as the RIC specimen pictured in the book. So far so good. Okay Looks like I got something rare. Well maybe maybe not. I got one reference, and search engines that start at best in the late 1990's. Furthermore these search engines are rather limited and while they do cover a large number of auctions do rather more poorly with FPLs and on line operations like Ebay and V Coins. Another factor might be that this is a variation on a fairly common theme within the coinage of Domitian, an reverse featuring Minerva. Because of this, the coin may not have been thought suitable for presentation in an important auction. So when dealing with such a coin I would advise caution. This coin may be rare but there is the possibility that it is not. PS I bought the coin because I liked it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Rarity of Ancient Coins.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...