Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Tom B, post: 1856568, member: 11854&quot;]Ahhh...I see where we were on different pages. </p><p><br /></p><p>This might be counterintuitive, but I will attempt to explain.&nbsp; When a coin is in a SEGS (or take your pick of off-brand holders) then I view it as being raw, but it still has increased liquidity in the broader market because it is viewed as authentic to a higher degree than when raw.&nbsp; Therefore, while <i>I </i> would consider the coin as raw, or worse than raw, the broader market can reward the coin either with greater value or increased liquidity because there is a greater assurance of authenticity.</p><p><br /></p><p>The value or liquidity can be further enhanced by what the label states and in this case the coin has a straight grade, which means that if it went into a problem holder from another company that certain portions of the market would react differently to the package.</p><p><br /></p><p>This all makes sense in my head and I think we are in agreement on most every major point, but I may not have written it well enough to convey the ideas effectively.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in