Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;RedSeals, post: 1640135, member: 38276&quot;]Fantastic response.&nbsp; The comment about the quality of the paper is what is considered in IBNS grading really clears much up for me.&nbsp; This is not very clear in the SCWPM. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If I understand correctly after grade is assigned to the paper quality, the eye appeal of the note are then measured and reflected in price. Not terribly different from US standards: if you take a sample of 10 VF25 $5 Chiefs (not net or apparent graded, otherwise &quot;no issues&quot;), there should be a few which face up remarkably better than their counterparts, and their prices should reflect that.&nbsp; Same in UNC grades, but maybe with a less dramatic effect, as some 65s are slightly better than other 65s </p><p><br /></p><p>I agree 100% with the the absurdity of the 70 point scale and would be interested in hearing more about your 100.9 idea, specifically what determines the increments after the decimal point.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">This is my understanding as well.</span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Good question...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in