Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Quick question - desert patina: real or fake?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GregH, post: 2375760, member: 75936"]I guess it's slightly reassuring that Athena applies this patina to coins with or without problems - ie the patination doesn't necessarily mean anything was wrong in the first place.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am concerned about this Uranius coin that came from him. It's extremely rare and cost big bucks (I'm embarrassed to say how much - but well into the four digits). It's doubly interesting to me because it's a very rare emperor, and has the baetyl (meteorite) of Elagabal on the reverse in the temple in Emesa - which seems to prove that by 253AD the meteorite was returned to Emesa. As far as I know this obverse/reverse die combination is unique. </p><p><br /></p><p>But now this discussion about patination has raised concerns. The patination on the reverse seems to be piled on quite thick. Removing it - and risking damage - is not something I want to do on a coin this valuable. I can't find a match in the coin archives, so I have no idea what the coin originally looked like.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]486351[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GregH, post: 2375760, member: 75936"]I guess it's slightly reassuring that Athena applies this patina to coins with or without problems - ie the patination doesn't necessarily mean anything was wrong in the first place. I am concerned about this Uranius coin that came from him. It's extremely rare and cost big bucks (I'm embarrassed to say how much - but well into the four digits). It's doubly interesting to me because it's a very rare emperor, and has the baetyl (meteorite) of Elagabal on the reverse in the temple in Emesa - which seems to prove that by 253AD the meteorite was returned to Emesa. As far as I know this obverse/reverse die combination is unique. But now this discussion about patination has raised concerns. The patination on the reverse seems to be piled on quite thick. Removing it - and risking damage - is not something I want to do on a coin this valuable. I can't find a match in the coin archives, so I have no idea what the coin originally looked like. [ATTACH=full]486351[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Quick question - desert patina: real or fake?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...