Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;baseball21, post: 2771985, member: 76863&quot;]Your post is based on some fallicies. The sunnywood coin is vividly toned, the majority of its value is in the toning.&nbsp; The grade bump probably did little to its final sale price, that coin was going to sell for a large premium in either grade.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>You also just can&#039;t keep resubmitting something over and over and over and it will eventually upgrade that just isn&#039;t how it works despite what a lot of people on the internet want us to believe. Using the sunnywood as an example what likely changed is that eye appeal is becoming a bigger part of a coins grade, that coin is spectacular in either grade and obviously quite a few people thought it should have been a 68 from the start.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Labels are a reflection of the coin in the holder.&nbsp; Whether or not everyone agrees with every single one doesn&#039;t matter, it&#039;s not the label that makes the coin the coin makes the label.&nbsp; The honest truth is that most people aren&#039;t as good at grading as they think and certainly aren&#039;t experts in every series.&nbsp; They may just have different standards as well and there is nothing wrong with that, but they need to understand how their standards are different and not just bash everything for not using their personal standard.&nbsp; Grading is an art with subjectivity anyway, it shouldn&#039;t be treated like a math problem that only has one correct answer.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Also though there is nothing unethical about reaubmissions.&nbsp; That would only be unethical if a coin was doctored inbetween.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in