Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Questions about new Faustina II denarius
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 5143304, member: 89514"]An interesting fact about the children of Marcus Caesar and Faustina that almost no one else knows, because I have never published it: the sequence of Marcus Caesar's denarius reverse types seems to prove beyond reasonable doubt that sometime during his TR P III = Pius TR P XII, Marcus gave up numbering his TR P, so that when Pius became TR P XIII and then TR P XIIII, Marcus continued striking as just TR P III. Towards the end of Pius’ TR P XIIII, however, Marcus resumed numbering his TR P, and soon became TR P IIII with Pius TR P XV. Very soon thereafter the decision was made to restore Marcus’ original TR P numeration, so he changed from one day to the next from TR P IIII to TR P VI. I have even observed one denarius obverse die of Marcus that was used with his Clementia type dated both TR P III and TR P VI; easy to understand, for that was not an interval of two or three years as it might seem, but only a matter of months or weeks, as Marcus advanced from TR P III to TR P IIII soon after 25 Feb. 151, then corrected that TR P IIII to TR P VI soon thereafter. This reconstruction explains for the first time why coins of Marcus as TR P IIII are all very rare, and why he struck no coins at all dated TR P V: by updating his tribunician number from TR P IIII to TR P VI, he had jumped over TR P V. </p><p><br /></p><p>I think only one explanation is possible for this remarkable deviation in numbering. Marcus had received the TR P for producing his first child with Faustina in 147. His refusal to advance his TR P two years later (probably he renounced that power altogether and no longer considered it current) can only mean that <i>his and Faustina’s first two children had both died! </i>Marcus was always extremely scrupulous about adopting honorary titles, so it makes perfect sense that when all of his children had died, he refused to hold the TR P any longer. When Lucilla was eventually born on 7 March 151, Marcus resumed holding the tribunician power, first as just TR P III and then IIII, but soon restoring his old numeration with TR P VI. </p><p><br /></p><p>If I am correct about Marcus' temporary resignation from his tribunician power in 150-151 AD, then the birth dates of his first three children are likely to have been as follows:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. A daughter, born 30 Nov. 147, resulting in the titles Augusta for Faustina and TR P for Marcus, as recorded in the Ostian Fasti.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. A son, born between c. Sept. 148 (nine months after Faustina's first childbirth) and March 149, commemorated on the crossed cornucopias coins of Antoninus Pius as TR P XII. The children on the two cornucopias in this type are traditionally assumed to have been male twins, but there is no reason why the type should not commemorate the birth of a single son to join the earlier daughter, and on a couple of dies the portraits seem to be differentiated, with the daughter on the right having longer hair with a small bun (cf. Strack, pl. XIII, 1026). Both of these children had died, however, before March 149, for by that time Marcus was no longer numbering his TR P.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Lucilla, born 7 March 151, apparently commemorated by the LAETITIA COS IIII type (Ceres and Proserpina) on aurei of Antoninus as TR P XIIII. A longed-for daughter had now been restored to Faustina too, so the type seems appropriate. A chronological difficulty: Lucilla's attested birthday was 7 March (year unnamed), but Marcus had apparently already resumed his tribunician power before he became TR P IIII in 151, on a tribunician day which is assumed to have been the same as Antoninus', viz. 25 February. But if Marcus became TR P IIII on 25 Feb. 151, then he would appear to have resumed his TR P about ten days <i>before</i> Lucilla's birth, so at a time when he was still childless. Perhaps Antoninus' tribunician day was actually a couple of weeks later, maybe when his tribunician assembly met, 25 Feb. having been the day when Hadrian adopted him and the Senate proclaimed him Caesar.</p><p><br /></p><p>So the tallest child on DonnaML's denarius, at far right, would appear to deserve the name Lucilla, now about nine years old.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 5143304, member: 89514"]An interesting fact about the children of Marcus Caesar and Faustina that almost no one else knows, because I have never published it: the sequence of Marcus Caesar's denarius reverse types seems to prove beyond reasonable doubt that sometime during his TR P III = Pius TR P XII, Marcus gave up numbering his TR P, so that when Pius became TR P XIII and then TR P XIIII, Marcus continued striking as just TR P III. Towards the end of Pius’ TR P XIIII, however, Marcus resumed numbering his TR P, and soon became TR P IIII with Pius TR P XV. Very soon thereafter the decision was made to restore Marcus’ original TR P numeration, so he changed from one day to the next from TR P IIII to TR P VI. I have even observed one denarius obverse die of Marcus that was used with his Clementia type dated both TR P III and TR P VI; easy to understand, for that was not an interval of two or three years as it might seem, but only a matter of months or weeks, as Marcus advanced from TR P III to TR P IIII soon after 25 Feb. 151, then corrected that TR P IIII to TR P VI soon thereafter. This reconstruction explains for the first time why coins of Marcus as TR P IIII are all very rare, and why he struck no coins at all dated TR P V: by updating his tribunician number from TR P IIII to TR P VI, he had jumped over TR P V. I think only one explanation is possible for this remarkable deviation in numbering. Marcus had received the TR P for producing his first child with Faustina in 147. His refusal to advance his TR P two years later (probably he renounced that power altogether and no longer considered it current) can only mean that [I]his and Faustina’s first two children had both died! [/I]Marcus was always extremely scrupulous about adopting honorary titles, so it makes perfect sense that when all of his children had died, he refused to hold the TR P any longer. When Lucilla was eventually born on 7 March 151, Marcus resumed holding the tribunician power, first as just TR P III and then IIII, but soon restoring his old numeration with TR P VI. If I am correct about Marcus' temporary resignation from his tribunician power in 150-151 AD, then the birth dates of his first three children are likely to have been as follows: 1. A daughter, born 30 Nov. 147, resulting in the titles Augusta for Faustina and TR P for Marcus, as recorded in the Ostian Fasti. 2. A son, born between c. Sept. 148 (nine months after Faustina's first childbirth) and March 149, commemorated on the crossed cornucopias coins of Antoninus Pius as TR P XII. The children on the two cornucopias in this type are traditionally assumed to have been male twins, but there is no reason why the type should not commemorate the birth of a single son to join the earlier daughter, and on a couple of dies the portraits seem to be differentiated, with the daughter on the right having longer hair with a small bun (cf. Strack, pl. XIII, 1026). Both of these children had died, however, before March 149, for by that time Marcus was no longer numbering his TR P. 3. Lucilla, born 7 March 151, apparently commemorated by the LAETITIA COS IIII type (Ceres and Proserpina) on aurei of Antoninus as TR P XIIII. A longed-for daughter had now been restored to Faustina too, so the type seems appropriate. A chronological difficulty: Lucilla's attested birthday was 7 March (year unnamed), but Marcus had apparently already resumed his tribunician power before he became TR P IIII in 151, on a tribunician day which is assumed to have been the same as Antoninus', viz. 25 February. But if Marcus became TR P IIII on 25 Feb. 151, then he would appear to have resumed his TR P about ten days [I]before[/I] Lucilla's birth, so at a time when he was still childless. Perhaps Antoninus' tribunician day was actually a couple of weeks later, maybe when his tribunician assembly met, 25 Feb. having been the day when Hadrian adopted him and the Senate proclaimed him Caesar. So the tallest child on DonnaML's denarius, at far right, would appear to deserve the name Lucilla, now about nine years old.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Questions about new Faustina II denarius
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...