Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Owle, post: 1468893, member: 22004&quot;]ANACS and NGC wouldn&#039;t do this IMO.</p><p><br /></p><p>OK, so what are their categories for problem coins.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.pcgs.com/nogrades.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/nogrades.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/nogrades.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I have had 1700s coppers that no grade because the date is not clear to them, etc..&nbsp; I had a coin certified by one of the other grading services sent to NGC for crossover, a $20 gold coin and they said absolutely fake, phoney, a lying piece of fabricated gold.&nbsp; At least they call a spade a spade, and so will ANACS.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a coin that Heritage called &quot;questionable authenticity&quot; though PCGS had certified AU50:</p><p><a href="http://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/51157/1865-Liberty-Double-Eagle-PCGS-AU-50" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/51157/1865-Liberty-Double-Eagle-PCGS-AU-50" rel="nofollow">http://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/51157/1865-Liberty-Double-Eagle-PCGS-AU-50</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Why questionable authenticity?&nbsp; The mintmark was obliterated according to Heritage.&nbsp; I saw it as an issue when I had the coin in hand, CAC would not sticker and did not find the issue significant enough to comment though I asked them specifically to examine the mintmark area. Great Collections refunded immediately upon return with the paperwork from Heritage![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in