Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Questionable 1967 Quarter Error...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2800275, member: 71723"]I frankly don't know if it's "dryer" or "drier", but this much I do know - if it has been in there for years, as some have, or weeks, as some have, it'll make a "yuge" difference. Age-related impending deafness is a dangerous thing. I once had a cat that died of it. SPLAT! He never moved as the car approached.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for differential resistance to failure of 100% Cu vs. 75/25 Cu/Ni, I'm pretty sure that's why they chose the 75/25 Cu/Ni option. It's tough stuff against many corrosives while still retaining strikability. They don't just choose these alloys at random out of a hat, you know.</p><p><br /></p><p>I've been privy to some "inside discussions" over a new alloy to replace 75/25 in our circulating coins. No, bullionistas, they're NOT bringing silver back, calm down, deep breaths. If they spent even 1/10 the time getting <b><i>TO</i></b> 75/25 as they've spent getting <b><i>OUT</i></b> of 75/25, they spent beaucoup time on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, a "drier" coin is less wet, right? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2800275, member: 71723"]I frankly don't know if it's "dryer" or "drier", but this much I do know - if it has been in there for years, as some have, or weeks, as some have, it'll make a "yuge" difference. Age-related impending deafness is a dangerous thing. I once had a cat that died of it. SPLAT! He never moved as the car approached. As for differential resistance to failure of 100% Cu vs. 75/25 Cu/Ni, I'm pretty sure that's why they chose the 75/25 Cu/Ni option. It's tough stuff against many corrosives while still retaining strikability. They don't just choose these alloys at random out of a hat, you know. I've been privy to some "inside discussions" over a new alloy to replace 75/25 in our circulating coins. No, bullionistas, they're NOT bringing silver back, calm down, deep breaths. If they spent even 1/10 the time getting [B][I]TO[/I][/B] 75/25 as they've spent getting [B][I]OUT[/I][/B] of 75/25, they spent beaucoup time on it. By the way, a "drier" coin is less wet, right? :rolleyes:o_O[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Questionable 1967 Quarter Error...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...