Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Barberian, post: 26800009, member: 24442&quot;]I have one SLH that needs to have the attribution corrected.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know if the proper attribution, in this case, 1874 WB-5 SLH, will prompt PCGS into dropping their incorrect WB-2 designation and accepting this die marriage.&nbsp; They accept other DMs with these obverse and reverse dies, what&#039;s the problem with a new die pairing involving these dies?&nbsp; PCGS makes my head explode.&nbsp; They&#039;re &quot;die marriage deniers.&quot;&nbsp; It exploded the past two days and now I&#039;ve been booted for telling too much truth about the lack of effort put into their ancillary services.</p><p><br /></p><p>As it stands, my WB-5 is the plate coin for WB-2, so they&#039;ll continue to look incompetent. I may have to submit the coin just to have the DM removed from the label for a mechanical error.&nbsp; Perhaps a DM designation from VSS will convince them that WB-5 is legit DM.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in