Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Question on re-submitting proofs
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="gmarguli, post: 441418, member: 246"]<b>1) Does PCGS have a similar policy ?</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Not sure, but I believe that reholders are looked at by a grader.</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><b>2) Under what conditions would a downgraded, reholdered coin receive no compensation ? Why would a coin not qualify under the grade guarantee ?</b></p><p><br /></p><p>NGC has a poor guarantee for coins minted with copper. A coin that was graded 20 years ago as MS65RD and is now MS65RB or MS64RB would not qualify for their guarantee. </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><b>3) Normally, regrading fees (with submitter's intent to upgrade) are "tier price" (usually <b>$16 to $30</b>). But reholdering (with potential to downgrade) only costs <b>$5</b>. </b></p><p><b> </b></p><p><b>It seems NGC incurs the same "costs of doing business" either way. Seems they're losing money providing a grading process for $5. </b></p><p><b> </b></p><p><b>So what is the financial driving force ? Removing undergraded coins from the market to protect reputation ?</b></p><p><br /></p><p>NGC offers downgrade review for free. If you feel a coin is overgraded you can send it back and have it looked at for free. </p><p><br /></p><p>A true regrade where you want an upgrade is where the coin is removed from the slab and goes thru the grading process again and will be examined by a full set of graders. The reholder is examined by only one grader, I believe. There is zero chance for an upgrade with a reholder.</p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><b>4) Does the submitter have an option ? Can they choose between keeping the coin in the current holder or accepting compensation ?</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe. I've heard of both submitters being contacted before anything was done and coins being downgraded without notice and the submitters being contacted afterward. </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p><b>5) Why don't they mention this "downgrade potential" on their website ? That's an important detail there. The way they describe it implies it is just a mechanical "replace the slab" process, not a numismatic "grade the coin" process.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>No idea. I suspect that there is language about this potential on the submission forms or perhaps in the dealer agreement.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="gmarguli, post: 441418, member: 246"][B]1) Does PCGS have a similar policy ?[/b] Not sure, but I believe that reholders are looked at by a grader. [B]2) Under what conditions would a downgraded, reholdered coin receive no compensation ? Why would a coin not qualify under the grade guarantee ?[/b] NGC has a poor guarantee for coins minted with copper. A coin that was graded 20 years ago as MS65RD and is now MS65RB or MS64RB would not qualify for their guarantee. [B]3) Normally, regrading fees (with submitter's intent to upgrade) are "tier price" (usually [B]$16 to $30[/B]). But reholdering (with potential to downgrade) only costs [B]$5[/B]. It seems NGC incurs the same "costs of doing business" either way. Seems they're losing money providing a grading process for $5. So what is the financial driving force ? Removing undergraded coins from the market to protect reputation ?[/b] NGC offers downgrade review for free. If you feel a coin is overgraded you can send it back and have it looked at for free. A true regrade where you want an upgrade is where the coin is removed from the slab and goes thru the grading process again and will be examined by a full set of graders. The reholder is examined by only one grader, I believe. There is zero chance for an upgrade with a reholder. [B]4) Does the submitter have an option ? Can they choose between keeping the coin in the current holder or accepting compensation ?[/b] Maybe. I've heard of both submitters being contacted before anything was done and coins being downgraded without notice and the submitters being contacted afterward. [B]5) Why don't they mention this "downgrade potential" on their website ? That's an important detail there. The way they describe it implies it is just a mechanical "replace the slab" process, not a numismatic "grade the coin" process.[/b] No idea. I suspect that there is language about this potential on the submission forms or perhaps in the dealer agreement.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Question on re-submitting proofs
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...