Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2418713, member: 1892&quot;]For the record, I think it&#039;s fake, too. But....</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s only 1.5% light, and can you say with <i>absolute certainty</i> that all 1895-S varieties have been discovered?</p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s the &quot;cartoonish&quot; date, overlaid with one from a Heritage VG18:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]500817[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Digits are too thick, especially in view of the level of wear - which doesn&#039;t even closely match, obverse to reverse, which is my own personal reason for believing it counterfeit - it&#039;s <i>nowhere near</i> a VG reverse - but it&#039;s not <b>that</b> far off. Spacing is pretty darn good.</p><p><br /></p><p>The images aren&#039;t clear enough to make out what&#039;s happening around the N.</p><p><br /></p><p>Get it into the hands of somebody. Maybe [USER=1765]@messydesk[/USER] would like to look at it. It&#039;s a pretty decent fake, at least in these images.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in