Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question: Do TPG's sometimes designate "cleaned" when there's no evidence of cleaning?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2865766, member: 112"]This is a common occurrence.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is also a common occurrence.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps less common than the two above, but one that has been going on for as long as I can remember.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>In a way it's already been said by others, but I'd say that answer boils to one word - experience. As I have said many times, learning how to correctly identify harshly cleaned coins is one of the most difficult things there is to learn in numismatics. This is because there are so many different ways that a coin can be harshly cleaned, and each one has a very different look. And that look can be further complicated by which type of coin it is, as well as the amount of underlying detail remaining on the coin. Combine all those things and there is an overwhelming amount you need to know. And if you don't know it, well, you're not going to see it - no matter how hard you look.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think most here have heard it said that the best way to learn about coins is to look at many, many examples of them. And that same axiom applies here as well. Take any coin type, and I use type in the standard definition as it applies to coins, and the best way to be able to correctly identify a harshly cleaned example is to know what an example, in a given grade, that has not been harshly cleaned looks like. Once you have that familiarity, that degree of experience, a harshly cleaned example almost seems to jump up and slap you in the face at a glance. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Kinda sorta but not really. As another member said above, when the suspicion exist, caution is the best course of action for them. It's not that they are giving up just so they can move on, it's that they see something is wrong, something is just not right. As I mentioned above, harshly cleaned coins can have many different looks, and a lot of the time that look is all you have to go by.</p><p><br /></p><p>Based on everything I've read on various coin forums over the last 20 plus years a lot of folks seem to think that in order to be considered harshly cleaned that a coin is going to be covered with hairlines and or fine scratches. But that is not the case at all. As a matter of fact a coin can have a lot of hairlines and fine scratches and yet not have been harshly cleaned. And it is up to you to be able to tell the difference between the two. And the only way one can do that is by having the necessary experience.</p><p><br /></p><p>And then you have to consider that things are complicated even more by the history of it all and by changes in standards. And I don't mean changes in grading, but changes in what is considered harsh cleaning, and what is not. For example, years ago if a coin had a single wipe mark it was considered to have been harshly cleaned - as it should have been. In today's world that's no longer the case. Today they base their rulings on a matter of degree with many coins - this much harsh cleaning is OK and that much is not. And to make it even worse the older the coin is, or the more scarce it is, or the more it cost, or what pedigree it has, the more leniency they are going to apply.</p><p><br /></p><p>So it's no wonder that people are confused. They have all these coins in older slabs to look at that were graded under old standards, and then all these coins in newer slabs that were graded under newer standards - and when you compare the two there is no comparison. It's like you are looking at two different things, and in point of fact you are looking at two different things. But if you don't already know that you're going to wonder why nothing seems to make sense and end up sitting there scratching your head.</p><p><br /></p><p>What it boils down to is this, there are rules as to what defines harsh cleaning, and those rules are complicated by the time factor. But - sometimes the rules are thrown out the window. At least when it comes to the TPGs.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2865766, member: 112"]This is a common occurrence. This is also a common occurrence. Perhaps less common than the two above, but one that has been going on for as long as I can remember. In a way it's already been said by others, but I'd say that answer boils to one word - experience. As I have said many times, learning how to correctly identify harshly cleaned coins is one of the most difficult things there is to learn in numismatics. This is because there are so many different ways that a coin can be harshly cleaned, and each one has a very different look. And that look can be further complicated by which type of coin it is, as well as the amount of underlying detail remaining on the coin. Combine all those things and there is an overwhelming amount you need to know. And if you don't know it, well, you're not going to see it - no matter how hard you look. I think most here have heard it said that the best way to learn about coins is to look at many, many examples of them. And that same axiom applies here as well. Take any coin type, and I use type in the standard definition as it applies to coins, and the best way to be able to correctly identify a harshly cleaned example is to know what an example, in a given grade, that has not been harshly cleaned looks like. Once you have that familiarity, that degree of experience, a harshly cleaned example almost seems to jump up and slap you in the face at a glance. Kinda sorta but not really. As another member said above, when the suspicion exist, caution is the best course of action for them. It's not that they are giving up just so they can move on, it's that they see something is wrong, something is just not right. As I mentioned above, harshly cleaned coins can have many different looks, and a lot of the time that look is all you have to go by. Based on everything I've read on various coin forums over the last 20 plus years a lot of folks seem to think that in order to be considered harshly cleaned that a coin is going to be covered with hairlines and or fine scratches. But that is not the case at all. As a matter of fact a coin can have a lot of hairlines and fine scratches and yet not have been harshly cleaned. And it is up to you to be able to tell the difference between the two. And the only way one can do that is by having the necessary experience. And then you have to consider that things are complicated even more by the history of it all and by changes in standards. And I don't mean changes in grading, but changes in what is considered harsh cleaning, and what is not. For example, years ago if a coin had a single wipe mark it was considered to have been harshly cleaned - as it should have been. In today's world that's no longer the case. Today they base their rulings on a matter of degree with many coins - this much harsh cleaning is OK and that much is not. And to make it even worse the older the coin is, or the more scarce it is, or the more it cost, or what pedigree it has, the more leniency they are going to apply. So it's no wonder that people are confused. They have all these coins in older slabs to look at that were graded under old standards, and then all these coins in newer slabs that were graded under newer standards - and when you compare the two there is no comparison. It's like you are looking at two different things, and in point of fact you are looking at two different things. But if you don't already know that you're going to wonder why nothing seems to make sense and end up sitting there scratching your head. What it boils down to is this, there are rules as to what defines harsh cleaning, and those rules are complicated by the time factor. But - sometimes the rules are thrown out the window. At least when it comes to the TPGs.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Question: Do TPG's sometimes designate "cleaned" when there's no evidence of cleaning?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...