Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Question about Van Meter
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="OutsiderSubtype, post: 4580397, member: 112457"]Here is a coin of Constantine, minted in his name by his frenemy Licinius:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1134372[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The obverse legend is IMP C CONSTANTINVS PF AVG.</p><p><br /></p><p>The reverse is IOVI CONSERVATORI AVGG NN and has Jupiter holding victory and an eagle with a wreath.</p><p><br /></p><p>The RIC reference is RIC Thessalonica 61b.</p><p><br /></p><p>My question is this:</p><p><br /></p><p>Van Meter (2000) lists this reverse with obverse legend 21, IMP CONSTANTINVS PF AVG, as number 48. Also listed is obverse legend 23, IMP C VAL CONSTANTINVS PF AVG, as number 49. </p><p><br /></p><p>It is not listed with obverse legend 22, which is the one I have.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, I get the impression that Van Meter meant for the obverse legend listings to be the most common obverses for the reverse type, rather than an exhaustive list.</p><p><br /></p><p>Would it be more correct to say the coin is not listed in Van Meter, or to give a reference to this reverse type and note that the legend is a little different? </p><p><br /></p><p>I should say that the purpose of this citation is for my records and that I'm not trying to sell the coin or anything.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for your insight.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="OutsiderSubtype, post: 4580397, member: 112457"]Here is a coin of Constantine, minted in his name by his frenemy Licinius: [ATTACH=full]1134372[/ATTACH] The obverse legend is IMP C CONSTANTINVS PF AVG. The reverse is IOVI CONSERVATORI AVGG NN and has Jupiter holding victory and an eagle with a wreath. The RIC reference is RIC Thessalonica 61b. My question is this: Van Meter (2000) lists this reverse with obverse legend 21, IMP CONSTANTINVS PF AVG, as number 48. Also listed is obverse legend 23, IMP C VAL CONSTANTINVS PF AVG, as number 49. It is not listed with obverse legend 22, which is the one I have. However, I get the impression that Van Meter meant for the obverse legend listings to be the most common obverses for the reverse type, rather than an exhaustive list. Would it be more correct to say the coin is not listed in Van Meter, or to give a reference to this reverse type and note that the legend is a little different? I should say that the purpose of this citation is for my records and that I'm not trying to sell the coin or anything. Thanks for your insight.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Question about Van Meter
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...